amassed. remember, these questions came before the raid on michael cohen s office. right. so there s also a lot of additional evidence, we don t know what that evidence says. certainly any prosecutor would want to have the benefit of the interview for a couple of reasons, one, to assess credibility, although i think we already know from the public record trump has a very large credibility problem, but also that they want to be able to test some of what they ve heard and see what the other side of the story is going to be. and you would never want your client to be interviewed by a prosecutor without yourself going through all the documents, all of the evidence you think that prosecutor might have. that s a lot of information to go through with a client. there s no way you would want your client to do that. matt, rod rosenstein has been put in a position here. he has said we re not going to be bullied. he s being bullied by the white house. has donald trump in a sense worked himse
this is a president who is also looking at actually ending potentially domestic violence as one of the bases for which a domestic violence survivor could seek asylum in our country. i do believe the tps was also withdrawn for people from he will salvador or honduras maybe. that s 57,000 people that have basically lived in this country for over 20 years that all of a sudden yesterday found out that they are no longer eligible, they are undocumented. and the trajectory of this administration by 2020 the president s directive are going to make close to half a million people that were here documented undocumented overnight. so i think what we really need to do is start drilling down and recognizing who is benefiting, profiting out of these individuals that are once documented, legally here, all of a sudden becoming undocumented. that is the private detention system who literally a week after the president was elected they started rallying their stock prices because they were making a l
actually broke just like my a michelle wolf said last week. i want to come the other point because the please stop helping category for rudy giuliani, he told the washington post that the repayments to cohen from trump took place over a period of time. probably all paid back by the end of 2017. that and probably a few other situations that might be considered campaign expenses. so, he s given away a few things. wanted to establish in this series of interviews that cohen was paid back an not look like an un-reimbursed expense. check. now he himself is offering that these payments had to do with the campaign. has he hurt his client? totally. i mean, look at the overall picture herement it s not just taking out little pieces here. you have an admission by all of them that they funneled money
the fact of the matter is that fisa parent initiated because of the trump campaign s own person who mouthed off to somebody in london over drinks about the fact he was aware that the russians had broken into the democratic national committee and had hacked all of the e-mails. there s a lot. michael daly was on with me last night and giuliani is incredibly close to the fbi, new york branch of the fbi and so much so that comey was having him investigated for whether he was getting advance knowledge of the clinton investigation from his friends in the fbi. that s how close he is. i want to come to you on this because the information last night, the wall street journal a scoop and then the new york times. start with the wall street journal and this is now about the lines of credit. we knew that there was $130,000 loan taken against his house by michael cohen and now over $700,000 in loans between him and his wife. according to the journal, in february 2016 as mr. trump s
so good at doing and exploiting and, in fact, what we have in this country right now is that the republican party has sent us their worst. the president of the united states who at this moment is basically attacking all of our communities and radically changing the direction of our country. i mean, as maria theresa was saying he is not only attacking undocumented i m grants he is radically trying to change our legal immigration system, restricting family immigration. over the next days, weeks, we are expecting yet another proposed rule from this administration that would basically radically change the way that families could be reunited, who is eligible for a green card, if a u.s. citizen child receives any kind of state or local or federal public benefit, healthcare, et cetera, safety net programs, that could be used basically to separate them from their mother. lastly, last word to you, maria theresa, you have seven states led by texas suing to end daca all together, we know these