Speaking today, a spokesperson for the brand told the BBC the issue effected about 10 lines out of thousands and it was due to an error in their brands buying up stock from suppliers who usually sell clothes to retailers who had closed during the pandemic.
The Boohoo group revealed they were launching a probe after an investigation revealed their brands were selling identical items for vastly different prices. And it appears the coat isn t the only item with a price disparity across the Boohoo brands, with the group selling a black coat in Warehouse for £18, while it was 150 per cent more expensive in Oasis at £27.
Woman claims £42 skirt she bought from Karen Millen was actually from Oasis where it was £12 cheaper dailymail.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dailymail.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Boohoo launch probe into identical clothes being sold at different prices with swapped labels: FEMAIL finds Oasis coat is 150% more expensive than the same one in Warehouse
Boohoo have launched a probe into their brands after it appeared they were selling identical items for vastly different prices across different labels
FEMAIL can reveal another coat costs £27 in Oasis, while just £18 in Warehouse
Comes following investigation that found another coat cost more in Coast than Dorothy Perkins
Online fashion retailer Boohoo sold the same products for different prices across a number of its fashion brands, a probe revealed.
Price disparities include selling a coat for £89 at Oasis with the same product listed as £65 at Dorothy Perkins.
Another product was being sold for £34 more via the Coast clothing website than it was listed as on the Dorothy Perkins website.
In pictures that will raise questions for the retailer, it appears the Dorothy Perkins branding was also cut off from the label of the product sold to Coast customers.
The retailer is investigating the differences across the Boohoo-owned brands and say that the error was not intentional .