(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)[UPDATE 4:49 p.m. EST: The Marshal of the Supreme Court has responded. see below]A former Chief Justice conducted an investig
The Supreme Court leak investigation accomplished two things: (1) we're all more sure than ever that the leak sprung from a justice; and, (2) the justices have burned every bridge with their extended staff. [NY Times] Three Days of the Counsel-OR. OK that was a stretch, but the Am Law 100 is coalescing around three-day office policies. Even if firms remain divided over what that looks like in practice. [American Lawyer] Director Doug Liman did a more comprehensive job vetting Brett Kavanaugh than the FBI. [Washington Post] Government asks to hold Martin Shkreli in contempt. There are so many industries in this world. is it that hard not to start a business in one covered by a court order? [FTC] Proskauer unimpressed with former COO's interpretation of his final days in the office. [Reuters]
letting the family sort of secrets and the family dysfunction spill to the outside world as opposed to actually trying to solve the problem and get to the bottom of what happened here. you know, you described it and senator mccaskill described it well. you talk about people like justice thomas, talk about people like justice alito, these are people who tha had clear opportunity, clear motive to want to leak the opinion. and last time i was on your show, nicolle, we were talking about that new york times report about the alito leak. that came out while this investigation was happening. why was that not a credible lead that sam alito might have been the leaker in this case too? and so the marshal puts out a statement saying there is no basis to interview the justices. that just defies belief. and it shows that the only reason you wouldn t conduct an investigation that included the justices themselves is because you re afraid of what you might find out. and in this case chief justice ro