Are factors that the courts are using in 1983 why not do the best we can do and other Law Enforcement agencies are incorporated those factors as well. Thank you ms. Miriam commissioner dejesus the proportionality language i got this case letter from the Bar Association late yesterday afternoon i plowed through that in here said the language is disappearing and people realized that was disappearing and informed the City Attorney the City Attorney was not part of working group do you know who was returning did drafts by the City Attorney and why did they change the language. Im not privy but other meetings no City Attorney that was at our meetings and contributing information at the meeting. This is something that mission should consider we did the policy and gave it to 9 working group my understanding from the third mooefrg then when the working group realized the City Attorney was chavrng a changing the language there was other language missing and im not sure what the City Attorney to
Loftus im not thank you, sergeant commissioner president loftus commissioner turman commissioner marshall commissioner dejesus commissioner mazzuco commissioner wong commissioner wong is in route and commissioner serlina have you a quorum and greg suhr the police chief and director the occ joyce hicks. Thank you sergeant id like to welcome everyone to the wednesday, may 4, 2016, Police Commission meeting i do have to start that meeting acknowledging the place were in as a city were here every once to do the work and there are still a lot of folks grieving and concerned and feeling like all the work were doing still isnt enough together is about continuing this work in actor and doing the work youll see the agenda from university of california, San Francisco to updates on collaborative reform to how were we keeping our streets save and the commission is doing the work and acknowledging there are a lot of folks still in pain and grieving and that for three and four no way just reaffirms
Undermine that would presumably been in the vacuums and thorough and exhaustive briefing this is legal and feasible and doable and an intent or distinct possibility but it is more of an afterthought as one potential argument why this is a problem and when he pressed the owner on this particular issue it was clear i dont know, there really see any real desire to do that development i dont see this is a situation are where the laboring are undermine the housing and clear to me this doesnt meet for the proponents of landmarking that stopping the development is not their goal there is no goal to develop that lot beyond what is there so im comfortable supporting this landmarking and ill make a motion to for the record that with a positive remedies. Supervisor peskin i was going to ask to associate myself with the finding made in the ordinance that is before us that was introduced by supervisor farrell and would add a friendly amendment it be sent as a report. He said that. That concludes my
Like a dream you wake up and it could be a worse nightmare now lets be realistic in todays economic world whats happening with some all of a sudden super powers we really have to be prudent with our monies i heard a figure outside 600 million has been satisfied for mountain tunnel and we think like were going to spend e. R. Keep aside of a hundred Million Dollars taxpayers money and think nothing of it i dont know what type of prudencecy or for the record or fortitude that is so commissioners, i think you have to look at it in a total different way when it comes to conservatism and everybody agrees why water water were told not to waste water im in a habit of not waiting water and from the presentation i saw you dont need to be a rocket scientists and that debt shouldnt fall on the taxpayer thank you very much thank you nicole. Good afternoon, commissioners nicole ceo i had 3 comments i wanted to make on this particular item first, i have found that budget to be the most helpful in pre
Commissioner johns. Yes. Commissioner matsuda. Yes. Commissioner pearlman. Yes. Commissioner hyland. Yes. And commissioner president wolfram. Yes. So moved. That passes unanimously 60. That places you on case ten for 2015011315fed at 800 Chestnut Street San Francisco Art Institute. This is for your review and comment. Good afternoon commissioners. Shannon Ferguson Department staff. The item before you is a National Register for the San Francisco Art Institute and its capacity as a certified local government of the city is given the opportunity to comment to the nominations to the register. The San Francisco Art Institute is located on Chestnut Street and jones street and two buildings and the original was in the spanish colleenial style in 1926 and paused valid architectures styles and playful human and proportion. According to the summary the San Francisco Art Institute is nationally significant under criterion a events for the roll in development of american art and for contributions