comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Alina polyakova - Page 28 : comparemela.com

OTHERS SAY: A path to stopping Putin in Ukraine

Russians switch to homegrown social media as crackdown bites

Russians switch to homegrown social media as crackdown bites
standardmedia.co.ke - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from standardmedia.co.ke Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

What the Biden administration learned from past presidents about military aid in Ukraine

The U.S. this week authorized one of its largest arms packages yet for Ukraine with $800 million worth of weapons designed to help it against an expected battle in the east. The question of whether to arm Ukraine is one that has challenged American policymakers for years. Ali Rogin looks back at how recent presidents have addressed that question and what the Biden administration has learned.

Transcripts for MSNBC The 11th Hour With Stephanie Ruhle 20240604 03:03:00

defense. washington city and foreign affairs seen. and alina polyakova the president and ceo of the center of european policy. she is also a professor of european studies at the john hopkins university. kevin, john kirby was on this network earlier tonight. i want to show what he said about this new military aid. we are really focusing this package, much more closely on the fight today given what the russians have now done in reply or tie think their efforts in the east. these new capabilities that the president authorized will help them in the fight in the east. kevin, i think i said kevin bacon, it is always on my mind, i obviously meant kevin baron. how much of a difference can this package make? and specifically, what is in it. what is and it is helicopters, number one. the u.s. has resisted sending direct air support for ukrainians. you know, we went through weeks and weeks of how to get fighter

Transcripts for MSNBC The 11th Hour With Stephanie Ruhle 20240604 03:14:00

talk. and again, mr. cipollone and mr. we re always pushing back according to their accounts on the presidents most outlandish views on how the election might be taken back from the democrats. so they have always sort of presented themselves as the voice of reason in the oval office during these tumultuous times. whether or not the committee could ve subpoenaed them, the fact that they did so voluntarily gives a crematoria of legitimacy to their testimony at this point. but the testimony is really preliminary at this point. it was not taken under oath. it is likely that they will be brought back in for interviews, and even depositions. this was not even transcribed. so it seemed to be more exploratory, than anything else. the idea that the president blessed this, and waived the privilege, again is more tentacles and actually informative. the former president is not in a position to exert this kind of privilege, at least at this point. tim, the new york times got

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.