Reality TV producer Neville Hendricks, whose company was the claimant in
Mr H TV Ltd v Archerfield Partners LLP, had objected to the London firm taking a share of his total £8.6m settlement from litigation with television channel ITV2.
Hendricks said he had not given ‘informed consent’ to the costs element but this argument was rejected by Master Victoria McCloud in the senior courts costs office in late 2019.
Applying for permission to appeal that ruling in the High Court, Hendricks’ lawyer Alexander Hutton QC argued that ‘horse trading’ between Archerfield and ITV2 resulted in agreement on the £3.6m costs without the client’s consent. It was submitted that the figures were reached after Archerfield had ‘gone global’ with the amounts being discussed rather than breaking them down into specifics.
clips capable of holding 100 rounds. the police chief said it was purchased legally and there was nothing in his past that would have prevented him from buying a weapon. thank you. that police response was so incredible. we saw the same in the gilroy shooting last weekend in california. all right, fox news contributor lisa booth is still with me and we have some new gas, former senior economic advisor and alexander hutton. first time on the show, i wish it was in more positive circumstances but here we are. steve, what is your take on this, again bearing in mind i think people are looking for something positive, constructiv constructive. first of all, donald trump is no more responsible for this kind of shooting then
clips capable of holding 100 rounds. the police chief said it was purchased legally and there was nothing in his past that would have prevented him from buying a weapon. thank you. that police response was so incredible. we saw the same in the gilroy shooting last weekend in california. all right, fox news contributor lisa booth is still with me and we have some new gas, former senior economic advisor and alexander hutton. first time on the show, i wish it was in more positive circumstances but here we are. steve, what is your take on this, again bearing in mind i think people are looking for something positive, constructiv constructive. first of all, donald trump is no more responsible for this kind of shooting then bernie sanders was for this