the fairest case come with the paralegal finds the expense check in the feed check and part of the story, you have heard the testimony but it sets off that query. so now we have this on top of everything else we are mentioning. this is like nothing he s ever experienced. he s always been able to stay one step ahead of the game but the v boat case, he steals millions of dollars and running out of options and all of these are converging. they are all converging on one week and one day. and that arrives. his father is in the hospital. there is a confrontation with jeannie. and alex tells her to ward off the conversation. he of course, denies that so i guess jeannie is lying too. but that is what she says
away. it is all changed. and that is why mark tinsley thought this case was over. this may seem like really? no one understands that better than him. this is the kind of work he did. his skills as a lawyer or understanding the emotional value of the case. understanding the sympathies of the case. if you have a sympathetic plaintiff and unsympathetic defendant, that is simple rule and a big case. but if those get reversed, those change and all of a sudden you were a dip in at end of the day, it changes it. it changes the entirety the position on this case was for the beach family that alex was going to have to pay money. that is what he told you from the stand. alex could be the victim of unsuspected or random vigilante, the entire case is change. and i m not trying to demand that level.
who got up on the stand and talked about the fact that there was some coverage about this case as we move into the spring of 2021. and we hear from alex and alex lies to him. we are hoping to get this case moving. you saw the text message to that effect when the reality was that it was stolen. how was he going to pay that, ladies and gentlemen? it is millions of dollars. it is millions of dollars. and eventually, eventually, they are going to figure out that this money has already been p paid. the insurance company thinks it is going to the right place. simple questions are going to get asked. that alone is going to break everything.
millions of dollars. alex doesn t have that. he is barely one step ahead of the game at this point. he doesn t have insurance coverage anymore or at least not a big umbrella policy. why? his insurance company dropped him after the satterfield case. the insurance company thinks the money went to the boys but it didn t. they don t know he stole it all. they don t want to ensure him anymore. he doesn t have that to help him pay the beach case. what s the one hope he has? that s the ferris case. they get a verdict in february of 2021, $792,000. eventually, he tells chris wilson, i m going to structure those, which is a lie. and gets the fees sent to him in
outside arbiter review these documents, does that make sense? i am curious the timing here. because hasn t the fbi had, white, almost two weeks now to look for these documents? hasn t the horse already kind of left the barn? it has actually been almost three weeks, i know it feels like it just happened yesterday. but the search warrant was executed on august 8th. the question, was, alex doesn t make sense to the special master here given how political and how charge this matter is? on the one, hand i agree with. you having an outside arbiter could remove some of the craziness around this lack of legal term. on the other, hand however, three weeks have passed. and more importantly, the usual factors that are present when you have a special master, they are not present here. usually we see special masters appointing where there is a tremendous volume of material. even though there were 26 boxes found at mar-a-lago.