interviewed objection overruled. not being interviewed in november 2022. not. so i asked why, why, why, they can t answer that. they don t have an answer as to why. now, how. how? how could alex in the time period we know we re going to get to it, but how could he have butchered maggie, paul, without leaving a trace of evidence within a matter of minutes? how, how? we went from why. now how. the answer to how is he couldn t. this is the wrong question to be asking yourselves. because the question that you are tasked with answering is has the state presented evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt showing that alex
and they can t answer that. they don t have an answer as to why. now how? how? how could alex in the time period we know we will get to it. but how could he have butchered maggie and paul without leaving a trace of evidence within a matter of minutes? how, how? the answer to the how is he couldn t. but this is the wrong question to be asking yourselves. the question that you are tasked with answering is has the state presented evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt showing that alex butchered maggie and paul and not a trace of evidence within a matter of minutes. have they proven evidence? did they present evidence of that, proof beyond a reasonable doubt? he was able to make bloody
got that shows she was in mount pleasant and traveling to moselle around the period of time where sister marion thought she was in edisto. did not happen. that doesn t mean that doesn t mean she was lying about that. absolutely not. that s just how she remembered it. and she also said when she talked to maggie that maggie was, you know, going to go over and visit mr. randolph at alameda. but we know from the records that mr. randolph re-entered the hospital. that s in the records and maggie knew it. we have maggie s text to blanca, i think, in the day saying they re putting mr. randolph back in the hospital, you know, we re scared for everybody and hope alex doesn t go down to the hospital. this is how marion remembered it. but if she remembered it incorrectly. and that happens.
0 fraud he had been committing for years, the defense pointing out that doesn t make any sense, all that did was landed him in law enforcement s focus. so, what we see here is the defense trying to eat away at the prosecution s case. they did that earlier by attacking forensic evidence. they spent a lot of time talking about blood splatter evidence and why that might not be a reliable indicator of guilt. and while the prosecution has the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution, in essence, has to convince the jury on each of these points. the defense only has to make that one small inroad, that s their strategy here here. joyce vance, thank you so much. that does it for me this hour. i ll be back tomorrow. jose diaz-balart reports starts right now. and good morning. 11:00 a.m. eastern, 8:00 a.m. pacific, i m jose diaz-balart. we re keeping our eyes on south carolina courtroom where former attorney alex murdaugh stands trial for the murder of his wife maggie and