the documents supplied by mr. wildstein s attorney, there was some redactions in documents supplied by mr. beroni s attorney, of the 20 some you re talking about, i m not sure where they came from, what s frustrating is, there s no explanation as to why they are redacted, are they claiming privilege? some type of exception to providing them under subpoena? we don t know, we have asked that question. with the 22 pages released, we have heard that hundreds of pages have been turned over. as someone trying to report this story, i get iffy reporting partially released documents. should we expect those pages will be released to the public? is there any reason to hold them back. and should we see these pages as representative of what you have learned? are we going to get the rest of it? there s thousands of pages of documents, and mr. wildstein s commission is 907 pages. what we want to do is have this hearing tomorrow, and provide mr. wildstein an opportunity
redactions. that wasn t you and your committee redacting those documents? most of the redactions in documents we received came from the documents supplied by mr. wildstein s attorney, there was some redactions in documents supplied by mr. beroni s attorney, of the 20 some you re talking about, i m not sure where they came from, what s frustrating is, there s no explanation as to why they are redacted, are they claiming privilege? some type of exception to providing them under subpoena? we don t know, we have asked that question. with the 22 pages released, we have heard that hundreds of pages have been turned over. as someone trying to report this story, i get iffy reporting partially released documents. should we expect those pages will be released to the public? is there any reason to hold them back. and should we see these pages as
wildstein s attorney, there was some redactions in documents supplied by mr. beroni s attorney, of the 20 some you re talking about, i m not sure where they came from, what s frustrating is, there s no explanation as to why they are redacted, are they claiming privilege? some type of exception to providing them under subpoena? we don t know, we have asked that question. with the 22 pages released, we have heard that hundreds of pages have been turned over. as someone trying to report this story, i get iffy reporting partially released documents. should we expect those pages will be released to the public? is there any reason to hold them back. and should we see these pages as representative of what you have learned? are we going to get the rest of it? there s thousands of pages of