Very, very small figure of speech. It will result in a reflex of violence. There is no time for anything but a response. The only option is it put the cuffs on the guy before he lands a punch. And we were talking about incitement and true threats. There is so much more time for the Law Enforcement inquiry. There are options other than immediately cuffing the person. And because it involves a much broad broader category of speech, its important to have inquiry into what the intent was. You know, basically, under the government standard, any speech that uses forceful language on rhetoric could be at risk. Somebody who in ferguson moshgs month, the night of the riots tweeted a photo of Law Enforcement officers over the motto, the old motto the tree of liberty must be flesh with the blood of tyrants. I mean would a reasonable person foresee that is viewed as a threat about it Police Officers . Again, i wouldnt want, you know, have a felony conviction against it. This is valuable First Amen
Under your test koshgs than prosecuted . Because eminem said it at a concert where people are entertained. Its not whether he said it private or on a Facebook Page after receiving protection if abuse order. Its not as though he appropriated a style of wrap that hes been doing previously and then tried to express violent statements that way. In the context, any reasonable person would conclude at a minimum that is there is ambiguities about the statements being a serious intention of an expression to do harm. This is critical here. Were talking about an area if the jury finds its ambiguous, it has to acquit. This is how the statements should be interpreted. Yes, but youre dealing with very inflamatory language. The question is whether or not the xwlr is going to be swept away with the language as opp e opposed to making the subtle determinations youre talking about. There are two protection theres. The government has to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. That is subject to appell
christine romans is minding your business. was it a trading error? there was an error somewhere, you had stocks trading at pennies at being at 40 and $50 a day. that s not rational. you have the stock market very weak and putting in one of the worst days we ve seen in a year before this happened. then suddenly at 2:45, boom, something happened, proctor and gamable shares and accenture fell off the cliff. we have never in history seen such a big one-day point decline. then just as rapidly it bounced back. everyone was trying to figure out what is happening the a lot of people told me that the high frequency trading, the computerized trading. the computers took off. there are numerous investigations, we don t know yet. once that happens, the technical trading took over and computers took over and selling happened. you had a huge decline here that was ferocious, it was described as violence on the dow. it is scary to know if it is a key stroke error or whatever it could ha