A water hospital to drain inside the building. This is the packet of the various violation notices that from 2001 to 2012. There was a lot of pressure on the new owners to start doing something about this. Also the subdivision of the property required that the portion of the building that of addressed to the north side be demolished because the subdivision law and department didnt allow the buildings to be overlapping over the Property Line and it was 6 feet off the existing north wall of 940 grove. And ill to start with the north Property Line thats the most controversial aspect of this project and its the only major recommendation we agree with. Staff is recommending you know that north facade be roared so id like to run you throw a quick history of this project and its lay out. If i could have the overhead. Commissioners this the the 940 building the gray is the existing roofline you can see the allegations to the roof were done quite sometime ago and as the lady indicated there wer
All right. Im being told theres a signed petition from the Square Neighborhood Association which is being passed up. . A certify to approve the rehabilitation projects that was originally approved in 2011. The project site is on the corner the existing lot is part of an existing lot that was subdivided in 2011. This corner lot contains the Historic Building that occupied the entire lot. It did allow the construction of 3 New Buildings that was once the rear yard of the Historic Building. Those buildings have not been constructed but the demolition has begun on that lot. The work enhance on the site under approval. Some of the design modifications that are approved h have been completed without prior approval from the planning department. So this is to legal lists those parts of the project that are completed and to prop further improvements. In the for modification of opposing at the north and east facade as well as wholesale replacement throughout United States building of orientation