is something which is disrupting the game of is something which is disrupting the game of golf is something which is disrupting the game of golf and is something which is disrupting the game of golf and some is something which is disrupting the game of golf and some may- is something which is disrupting the game of golf and some may alwaysl game of golf and some may always view it game of golf and some may always view it as game of golf and some may always view it as a game of golf and some may always view it as a very game of golf and some may always view it as a very positive game of golf and some may always view it as a very positive change i view it as a very positive change because view it as a very positive change because the view it as a very positive change because the pga view it as a very positive change because the pga tour view it as a very positive change because the pga tour has - view it as a very positive change because the pga tour has had i view i
is sure the military vessels - also would go to the bosporus which is sure the military vessels that - is sure the military vessels that would is sure the military vessels that would mean is sure the military vessels that would mean turkey is sure the military vessels that would mean turkey and - is sure the military vessels thati would mean turkey and needing is sure the military vessels that. would mean turkey and needing to change would mean turkey and needing to change its would mean turkey and needing to change its view would mean turkey and needing to change its view on would mean turkey and needing to change its view on how would mean turkey and needing to change its view on how that - would mean turkey and needing to i change its view on how that happens. and then of change its view on how that happens. and then of course change its view on how that happens. and then of course it s change its view on how that happens. and then of course it s liaison - change i
to accept thatjoe biden had won the election and took steps to stop the steal , to the day when congress gathered to certify the vote, what was his goal? did he want his supporters to go this far? and were the militias who marched to the capitol part of a conspiracy directed from the top? more than 800 of the rioters have been charged. the big question is whether the president will also be prosecuted. the committee only has the power to recommend legal action. i think that the committee believes he has committed crimes. a federaljudge has actually ruled that he likely committed a felony conspiracy to do what he did. but whether the justice department takes that view, i think that s going to be a much longer story. the story is also about the role played by trump s aides and loyalist republican lawmakers. the committee has examined their private communications. they rejected subpoenas to testify. and after initial criticism, the party has rallied around trump. john bresnahan was inside
the ukrainian government has given a brief initial response, saying that the trial was propaganda and that the men had the legal status of combatants. that view has been echoed by a legal expert in the uk who has said that this verdict and this trial is in fact a breach of international humanitarian law and of the geneva convention. but i think there was a certain inevitability about this. once ukraine started prosecuting russian soldiers, as it has done, three have already been convicted, once those trials were under way for war crimes, i think it was inevitable that we were going to see this kind of tit for tat persecution taking place, and of course, for vladimir putin, the opportunity to prosecute british combatants is something that clearly he didn t want to miss. something that clearly we don t know at this stage of any death penalty sentence has ever been carried out in the dpr. let s turn to the battle on the ground in the donbas. we know that fighting in severodonetsk, and nea