us. what do you make of the current israeli military operation in gaza? the aim of the operation is to replace the government of hamas, which is a government of isis, and to allow another arab state ruling gaza. gaza was taken by force from the palestinian authority, the plo, in 2007, and it should be returned to them if they wish. i just in 2007, and it should be returned to them if they wish. ijust heard on your news that president abbas is saying that he s ready to take upon himself the gaza strip if it is part of a process which includes the west bank, and i believe that this is something which is possible. hamas, as ou something which is possible. hamas, as you mentioned, something which is possible. hamas, as you mentioned, has something which is possible. hamas, as you mentioned, has been - something which is possible. hamas, as you mentioned, has been ruling i as you mentioned, has been ruling gaza since 2007. this is not a fight this group will give up easily, th
control of northern gaza after intense fighting. 50,000 palestinians fled to gaza city yesterday three evacuation routes after israel open a safe passage on the road to the south for several hours. meanwhile, a senior un official has accused both sides of committing war crimes. here is more from yolande knell. israel s vast military might on display once again. it says hamas has lost control of northern gaza and its troops are battling inside gaza city. this is a critical point in the war. and for the first time the bbc was given access behind israeli lines in gaza, escorted by soldiers. while the bbc had editorial control of the report, these pictures were cleared for use by the israeli military. i made it a huge disruption, officers showed what they said was a hamas weapons factory, set up below a family apartment. they insisted hamas, not israel, was responsible for civilian loss of life. we israel, was responsible for civilian loss of life- loss of life. we know intellig
Detail she actually had a plan on toughening this body that would prove these kinds of comforter hooked on my controversial deals. She is very knowledgeable on the subject shes a hawk on this issue. For her to pretend like i dont know what was going on stretches credulity and thats one of the reasons we need to have an investigation and really to this point, we have not had a congressional hearing on this. We have not had a grand jury as far as we know. Its just shocking to me that there has been no investigation on this whatsoever. Tucker just to be clear, the dots we are connecting are not very far apart. The chairman of this uranium country is also on the board of the Clinton Foundation and the coastline of the clintons. The Podesta Group lobbied on behalf of this company. Am i getting these facts wrong . You are exactly right. Heres the bottom line. As this deal was coming for approval in 2010 the clinton
foundation received from nine shareholders in this Uranium Company that was s