them a very brief, very brief, frankly, preview into the case to come. and i think it also tells us that we will have a number versions something around both in the interpretation of the telephone call and even if you listen to the call where meadows says this is the chief of staff, and the fact that they re calling from the oval office, it s a unique introduction. clearly, he didn t say this is the trump campaign. now, whether that s from the federal judge, i doubted. but it s a piece of information that will get put into the mix as they decide how it should lay forward and maybe compel it to an appeal court. the fact that he was repeatedly asked by prosecutors why he visited that atlanta facility where georgia officials were auditing ballot signatures, he said he was there on his own volition, the chief of staff, he was a visiting his two children for christmas. but how does this sit with the judge here? i think as what you re pointing out is how inconsistent a lot of the state