it has reminded us of this. laws are just words on paper. they mean nothing without public servants dedicated to the rule of law, and who are held accountable by a public that the leaves over this matter more than party tribalism or the cheap thrill of scoring political points. oaths. we must demand more of our politicians and ourselves. boths matter, character matters, truth matters. if we do not renew our faith and commitment to these principles, this great experiment of hours, our shining beacon on a hill, will not endure. i yield to that gentlewoman from virginia. thank you. throughout our hearings we have provided many facts and painted a vivid picture of the events of january 6th. the violence, the human toll, both emotional and physical, including the tragic loss of life. the threat to our constitution, the rule of law and the danger to this nation. a nation we all love as americans. and tonight s hearing, we have gone into great detail about the events inside the w
massive ideological gulfs. find but as of this moment they are not massive ideological gulfs.- massive ideological gulfs. and in terms of the massive ideological gulfs. and in terms of the party massive ideological gulfs. and in terms of the party and massive ideological gulfs. and in terms of the party and how- massive ideological gulfs. and in terms of the party and how this i massive ideological gulfs. and in i terms of the party and how this new leadership team is being responded to, what s happening? dare leadership team is being responded to, what s happening? leadership team is being responded to, what s happening? dare i say it, i don t to, what s happening? dare i say it, i don t think to, what s happening? dare i say it, i don t think there to, what s happening? dare i say it, i don t think there is to, what s happening? dare i say it, i don t think there is as to, what s happening? dare i say it, i don t think there is as much - to, what s happening? dare i sa
wouldn t lose any voters. that quote came to mind last week when audio from trump adviser steve bannon surfaced from october 31, 2020, just a few days before the presidential election. let s listen.- election. let s listen. jump will declare election. let s listen. jump will declare victory. - that doesn t mean he s a winner, he is. the early votes will count, they voted in may, so don t have an actual disadvantage. when you wake up on wednesday morning it is going to be a fire. also, if trump is losing by 10pm, leven pm, it will be crazier. he will sit right there and say they will have stolen it. if biden is winning it trump will do
the day is this going to make a difference in the mid term elections swaying this way or that way the republican party? i don t believe so. i don t believe so. amanda renteria. i don t believe so. amanda renteria, we i don t believe so. amanda renteria, we have - i don t believe so. amanda renteria, we have only - i don t believe so. amanda renteria, we have only a i i don t believe so. amanda - renteria, we have only a minute left. who for you was the star of this hearing? i left. who for you was the star of this hearing? of this hearing? i kind of thing the of this hearing? i kind of thing the laying - of this hearing? i kind of thing the laying out - of this hearing? i kind of thing the laying out of i of this hearing? i kind of. thing the laying out of the of this hearing? i kind of- thing the laying out of the 187 minutes, i still think what passive alone it had to say about them very key moments, he was closest. the culmination, watching some of those scenes still hits ev
another austerity government making the same mistakes that they cut into. to the same mistakes that they cut into. ., , ., i. the same mistakes that they cut into. .,, ., the same mistakes that they cut into. ., , ., ., the same mistakes that they cut into. ., , . . . into. to be fair you could have a debate about into. to be fair you could have a debate about this into. to be fair you could have a debate about this that into. to be fair you could have a debate about this that you - into. to be fair you could have a debate about this that you can - into. to be fair you could have a | debate about this that you can say the same of the labour government of the same of the labour government of the late 70s. it found itself trapped in that same thinking. we have to make cuts because if we don t it will be worse. it have to make cuts because if we don t it will be worse. don t it will be worse. it was imposed don t it will be worse. it was imposed and don t it will be worse. it w