are a little blotchier, it looks like there are these kind of yellow patches of pixels in there? exactly. if you had laid these out in front of me and said tell me what is different, i would be hard pressed to tell you. the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren t copies. that s led the companies being sued to ask for the case against them to be dismissed. karla says, though, that s not a good comparison. i don t see one image, let alone billions of imagery, and instantly like archive it in my mind, and then i m able to generate exact copies, or similar copies in the blink of an eye. some artists have said they would be willing to use their work with al image generators, but they say the process should be opt in, not opt out. stability ai says their new generators will be
generated from a piece with glaze is similar in content but not really in style. to learn more, we asked the team to show us glaze in action. you re going to see some changes already on the texture. thre right side one is the original one, this is the glazed one. you can see the face has some added changes here on the painting. right, so the brushstrokes are blotchier, it looks like there are these kind of yellow patches of pixels in there? exactly. if you had laid thse out in front of me and said tell me what is different, i would be hard pressed to tell you. the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren t copies. that s lead the companies being sued to ask for the case
against stability ai and a group of other ai image generators. in the meantime, karla made the decision to take her work off the internet wherever she could. this is professor ben chow, from the university of chicago. he and his lab say they have developed a solution. they call it glaze. at its core, glaze uses the fact that there is this ginourmous gap, difference between the way humans see visual images and how learning models see visual images. because we see things differently, glaze can make changes that are almost imperceptible to the human eye, but that dramatically alter how a machine sees it. so, if you are an artist, you glaze your art, post if online, you can rest comfortable in knowing that a model that is trying to steal your stuff from that piece will learn a very different style that is incorrect, and when it is trying to mimic you it will fail, and halt these attacks early. as you can see, the ai artwork generated from a piece the promise of glaze is exciting for artist
if you had laid thse out in front of me and said tell me what is different, i would be hard pressed to tell you. the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren t copies. that s lead the companies being sued to ask for the case against them to be dismissed. karla says though that s not a good comparison. i don t see one image, let alone billions of imagery, and instantly like archive it in my mind, and then i m able to generate exact copies or similar copies in the blink of an eye. some artists said they would be willing to use their work with al image generators, but they say the process should be opt in, not opt out. when peoplejump in on these and say oh, this is, wow! , we need to recognise that it is wow because of the work that is taken, and all of that work was taken without their consent to use, to train these
the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren t copies. that s lead the companies being sued to ask for the case against them to be dismissed. karla says though that s not a good comparison. i don t see one image, let alone billions of imagery, and instantly like archive it in my mind, and then i m able to generate exact copies or similar copies in the blink of an eye. some artists said they would be willing to use their work with al image generators, but they say the process should be opt in, not opt out. stability ai says their new generators will be opt out going forward, and adobe says its new image generator, firefly, has only been trained on images from its stock library. but even there, adobe contributors say this type