well, i guess maybe he doesn t understand that if the fbi goes to twitter and instructs them or persuades thetom to print bak a new york post story to pre censor it, then that is ast violation of the first agr amendment. i do agree ieen one sense thatd elon musk did not release anything that was really useful when it comes to the fbi si wonr intervention. and i wonder if that is becausea james baker is still there. and i assume that elon musk had to get his release of various documents cleared by twitter s lawyers before they went to matt taibbi. so maybe twitter s lawyerswe only allowed one little email from james baker e, had all the identifying the date, the time, all sean from it, which was very interesting. and the other thing about jat w james baker, that we need