I use experience you know, i have no idea whatsoever. And pozner suggested, i think i picked that up go and do empirical research. Why doesnt the government do it . Commissions tried to do it. Doesnt know where to begin. There are so many statutes. I think, Justice Breyer the very difficulty and unmanageability of the enterprise suggests it is not what congress had in mind. What congress had in mind was identifying classes of offenses that judges are confident involve serious potential risks of physical injury to another possibly the similarity in kind inquiry when the mens rea isnt satisfied. What Congress Expected courts to do was to analyze what the conduct is that is involved in it, compare it to the listed offenses and see if the risks are similar. Does the department of justice does the department of justice do any of that . Is one that the prosecutor asks for, and is there any guidance coming from the department of justice, guidance to the u. S. Attorneys, who are going to be as
Facts of this case the Economic Situation are somewhat different that are ordinarily true in this industry because as handlers the hornes actually assumed the full financial responsibility for the raisins that were not turned over to the department of agricultural. The producers in this case were fully paid for their raisins. This is a factual finding to be found in the judicial officers opinion at 66 a of the appendix to the petition. The hornes paid the producers for their raisins corn to the judicial officer, those raisins became part of the inventory of the hornes. When the risen Administrative Committee which i will refer to as the r. A. C. Came after the raisins it was the hornes and the hornes only who bore the economic burden of this taking. I thought the growers were paid only for the volume that they were permitted that was permitted the permitted volume and that they were not paid for what goes in the reserve pool . Justice ginsburg that is true in the ordinary coarse. That
Way to move the ball forward. Other members of the panel i dont know if anyone would like to comment on the clarity of the language. I would say while we recognize the preventy of it to simply say, go act reasonably, thats a negligent standard. Were all under a duty to act reasonably in our daily lives and not be negligent. When youre facing a threat of this nature, to have the congress say, hey, act reasonably, i think thats underwhemg as a standard and expectation as we enter the age of cyber battles. I would agree, particularly when youve got a road map thats worked for 16 years in another industry that you can lean on. Id like to talk a little bit about how unreasonable delay works in the real world. Theres talk about whether a notice should be immediate could you put some specific time frame on when a reasonable notice would occur. Could anyone on the Panel Comment on whether its realistic to require a company to notify consumers within a specific set of days . I think the challen
More children. People ask why the Utah Attorney general went to colombia. My reply number one, because such a High Percentage of those traveling abroad for sex parties are american. Some statistics suggest 80 or more of sex tourists may be american. Im embarrassed by that fact. That americans provide such demand. And i feel a responsible for remedy the scourge that my fellow countrymen have helped to create. Secondly, helping stop Human Trafficking no matter where it exists is vitally important. And to be clear, no state funds were used. I was not going down in my official capacity as the attorney general of utah in fact, nobody knew except for our closest Law Enforcement partners. Three, and i think this is critical to this discussion creating a firewall in countries like colombia and the many other countries that o. U. R. And other organizations like them have established to prevent future victor raxes from entering the shores of the United States and my state of utah. Through the co
The appendices about what, how to design and make manageable your local and state election website. These are developed by david, for those who know her. And expert who is develop these field guides, and one is state voter websites. [inaudible] mentioned two states that have gone to all mail voting. Is any discussion among the commissioners of the test and received or in the report about the virtue of each state retaining is one option among these other early voting options or things like that, but retaining as one option the voting day, you know, first tuesday after the first monday, at least for federal elections as provided in title ii. Retaining that one day for voting just because of the civic virtue value of having that opportunity to exercise that one day. I know ms. Patrick talked about not reducing the resources that are needed for that one day, and i think some of us feel its very important to have that one day, but going to all mail is a mistake. I was wondering if you discu