making a substantive impact whether this would go forward. whether that comes up in the courts as an intent of congress issue stills remains to be seen but it s not like they were passing a law that was going to be overridden by him. for the president, in 2020, he s going to have to make a pitch to voters why he did or didn t get things done. so you know, for him this notion of being an outsider for two years, the same party as the president controlled both chambers of congress. they still have the senate. so to continue to make this argument your agenda isn t moving forward because of congressional obstruction, the more times his party breaks with him, it s harder to make the argument it s because of someone else and not what he s pushing for. let s talk about impeachment with you, peter. you write about house speaker nancy pelosi s change in tune when it comes to impeaching the president. what s behind the shift? look, she s do math. the math is right now there is
the president s agenda isn t going to change regardless of whose party is there. we ll still be an administration focused on lowering taxes, defeengt ice is, remaking the judiciary, fixing the opioid crisis we have. i think we can work with democrats on that. bill: outside the west wing sarah sanders realbertaing to what we re trying to digest now in the mid-terms. big democratic takeover in the chamber could serve as a check in the president and house. what about the trump agenda and where does it go now and what are the voters saying? bret baier back from washington, d.c. good work there. talking during a commercial we could shoot at a thousand things. start with what you re starting to digest from last night. first of all, i think this will be a fascinating news conference. pretty energetic judging by the president s tweets this morning. already saying tremendous
access and one person s agenda isn t ever going to trump, to use a phrase, what this president is actually accomplishing. that is the bigger narrative and that s exactly what roger stone is saying. lisa: the intention is not to cover those things and that s where the media s focus is. they don t want to cover tax reform in 30 years. anwr in 40 years. individual mandate. pete: you are right. lisa: we have to turn to other headlines. there is other stuff going on, i guess. we begin with extreme weather. millions across the country bracing for dangerous record breaking cold we feel it here. sub zero expected from north carolina to maine. flooding streets in massesma. cars payroll lived under several feet of icy water. and in new jersey firefighters battling fierce winds fueling a house fire in newark. the violent storm blamed for at least 12 deaths. two planes colliding on the ground overnight passengers panicking as they watch flames erupt from the other
support the president and they want congress to support the president going to show up and vote in 2018 if they feel like they re not, they don t necessarily like what they re seeing out of washington and the agenda isn t getting accomplished. and that fundamentally becomes a question for republicans going forward. chris, i want you to react to andrew sullivan. he s a never trumper that put it this way. listen to. listen to this. he is the total master of an enormous mob that so far has completely overcome the elites. he achieves this through incendiary oratory, hourly provocations and relentless propaganda. his rallies are mass stage. his propaganda machines rarely crack and there is no one in our political life capable of matching this power. name one if you can. how about that, can you? no. i think trump is constantly and this is not a knock or a salute. he is like a really successful comedian. he s always in touch with the audience. he tries out a joke. if it works, he tell
written by someone else and publish it and have that be the editorial direction that that story would go. breitbart is not a news network. they re not a media organization. they re a propaganda machine. the fact that they would be so willing to collude to try to pander to the nationalist, racist demographic, their agenda isn t to tell the truth, it s to advance a radical agenda. it s very hard to believe, jennifer, the umbrage that they are not aligned with white nationalists, you now have brigeitbar breitbart. i thought they were against the aleit. they are fine with harvard and m.i.t. giving an excuse but still live on their website is an article that is co-by lined