scott pruitt and what he has done. he needs to be in the position. he doesn t need to be. he s traveling around the world. the republicans who are ib sins the, pa a epa are doing the wor. are there not dozens of republicans who could take pruitt s position and aren t saddled by the ethics problems? i think pruitt, the way he s handled himself as epa administrator, is going to damage the substance of policy positions he s taken. a lot of which i probably would agree with. i m not an expert on the issues, but i m more on the de-regulatory side and think president obama overreached in ways. now, it ll be part of a sort of, you know, agenda add vavanced b some guy who was cozy with industry, had few ethical standards, who misled reporters about all kinds of things. i think the one issue he has maybe legal vulnerability, not just pr, is the two raises he
him. that will be the change if the policy decisions continue to be unpredictable and if they continue to work with the democrats. there are surprising changes in how the media covers him. do you think so, eric? do you see that happening? i don t think trump is going to continue to advance the democratic agenda add naas yum througho nasium for the rest of the year. or today. not only doesn t the press want to call voters out, they want to, you know, hold them up as kind of virtuous. how many new york times stories have we read about the white rust belt voters. they ve written 15 profiles since january. yes. never once do they ask isn t trump racist? why did you vote for a racist?