Besides, Sharma will also be handling the affairs of the agency s Guwahati (Zone-2) office. While ED s Kolkata (Zone-1) office is responsible for probe against different chit fund entities based out of West Bengal namely Saradha Group and Rose Valley Group among others, the agency s Guwahati (Zone-2) office is handling the investigations against the Ponzi entities in Assam.So,
is i worry you don t have the details. i ve dealt with agencys that don t provide the details when you re in the middle of a crisis. right now i do not think we re to the bottom of it. if your phone records or my phone records are not subpoenaed, we cannot say, god help me, we have a device migration. step back. they had a device migration, quote, unquote, they were switching telephones and erasing data. why is a government agency erasing any data? there s all sorts of rules across the government. that s odd as it is. and the timing seems odd. at a minimum, both congress and the independent inspector general we re talking about this didn t happen on september 24th. it was january 5th and january 6th. these are consequential days that have happened. i m wondering when you hear from, say, congresswoman zoe lofgren who seem to think we re
like this . this was the power of the pursef that congress has and they should absolutely do it now.te and the most important thing here is, you know, there s soer much of this that is ridiculous and hilarious and absurd. but the most important thingst here is the thing you started out with which is the agencys that they have decided to put of information into is t the largest the most militant domestic agency we t have in this governmenthe. the dhs has more guns, has more bullets, has more material than any other federal department other thanas the department of defense. they buy bullets by the m.e. and the fact that they are choosing to put this ministry into that department tells you all you need to know.y and if if democrats as well as republicans but also democrats in congress are not terrified by this and doing everything they can to stop it ,then then we re done. we re finished.
longer an army to hunt them down, no longer director of the intelligence agencys and what afghan would support the u.s. now after u.s. abandoned them and said the afghan soldiers wouldn t fight when they lost over 66,000 soldiers fighting for their country. john: bill, real quick answer to this question. former defense secretary, former chief of staff, leon panetta say, we re going back into afghanistan because it will become a haven for terror again, is he right? i think he s right, i would argue it already is a haven for terror, al qaeda has been there. i don t think this president will go back into afghanistan, why would he leave if he thought he would have to go back? jauksz john: that is the question. bill roggio, thank you. sandra. sandra: the race to rescue