i think it s the latter. i think barack obama, george w. bush, they all could have had sim rl ssummits. we wouldn t have gotten here if it weren t for my inflamed rhetoric what is here exactly? such a great like undefanged threat is very faulty. i think, again, we re going to see what happens in the next few months. right now, i m n so convinced that this is a safer place than it was two weeks ago. well, only time will tell. kori, thank you so much. gentlemen, stick around. a gop congressman who publicly bashed president trump is ousted in the key primary. will it effectively silence other republicans. i don t know, they seem pretty silent to me, who are thinking about speaking out against the commander in chief. before we go, we ll be talk about reaction to president
if they said something very bad, threatening, horrible, don t answer. that s not the answer. that s not what you have to do. the rhetoric, i hated to do it, sometimes, i felt foolish doing it, but we have no choice. is he wrong here? because on some level, trump does understand kim jong-un. they re similar guys as absurd as it is to see dennis rodman wearing a potcoin shirt. this could work. re all similar beings. no, it went work, and it is wrong. rump it to pposition for those have summit than not.hamberlain summit with hitler. the reason why this could be dangerous, not just a farce but a catastrophe is because what trump is setting in motion can eventually make north korea more aggressive and stronger.
any bush or democrat or republican in the first year is minimal. beyond that, donald trump is not a normal candidate and that is what is going on is not a normal event. this is a man who is a pathological liar, who is not only engaged on an assault on truth, he s trying to rule truth. and they re deep in immorality, not just those terms, but a person who believes that night makes right. and the republican party which was born in the era of the civil war and lincoln, who is the greatest leader that america s ever produced is now aligned with this person who is a moral idiot. okay. so, we can agree to that. buwhato to evangelical christians who say you don t need to like the boss as long as he gets the job done.
i asked you a question about morality. he s not a moral catastrophe. i m not talking about his private morals. hugh, this man an assault, a one-man assae s pathological and chronic liar in a way that we have never seen before. that kind of assault on truth, in a party that once stood for objective truth, that once said that subjectivism is wrong. that there had to be a moral basis of politics. that politics was the exercise of ethics, that party now has lined up behind donald trump. katie addington w will beat sanford said this is the party of donald j. trump and it is. it s not just his private morals. it is the man, the public attitudes and public views of the man that are such an offense. and that is what the party is standing for. and they re going to pay a price for it. we re going to leave it there. remember, it was just two days
sanford, of course, we should say before all of this brought his own baggage to this. he s the former governor of south carolina.he s the onet wea few years ago, turns out he was in south america with his paramour and hiking the appalachian trails. with his paramour, you re so sweet to say it that way, steve. thank you, i appreciate you appreciating that. i would have said sidepiece.. we don t know, trump s tweet came less than three hours before polls closing. katie arrington is hitting that magic number of 50% which is means avoid the runoff. the significance here, when you talk about members of congress who irked president trump who op sthings, who stand up to him on some things we see a bitf a pattern here. last week in alabama, another republican candidate, martha