those are going to be limited. that s not something that from this opinion, people will certainly use this to argue their point but it s pretty narrow. shannon, is there any concern now that some of these closely held businesses, closely held corporations will now see this as a means to challenging other regulations that they re not comfortable with? that was the big concern had this been a broader ruling from the supreme court and affected bigger, more publicly held corporations. yes. something the government argued about in the case and opponents have voiced to me today. they re very worried that one of these closely held groups will be able to step up and say, i want to challenge social security or minimum wage or paying for vaccinations or something else. the court pretty much said the slippery slope, we re not decide that go today. we re saying in this case alone, these religious freedoms were violated so the executive branch, via this agency hhs, can t enforce t. they say it