Cases. The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussio
The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussion unles
The speaker pro tempore on this vote the devil rayr yeas are 228 on this vote the yeas are 228. The nays are 198. The resolution is adopted. Without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the Unfinished Business is the question on agreeing to the speakers approval of the journal which the chair will put de novo. The question is on agreeing to the speakers approval of the journal. So many as are in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. The journal stands approved. Pursuant to House Resolution 695, House Resolution 661, and the House Resolution 693 are considered as adopted. For what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition . Mr. Speaker, i ask unanimous consent that i may hearafter be considered as the first cosponsor of h. R. 1915, a bill originally introduced by representative cummings of maryland for the purpose of of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pu
Policies. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The decision ended a nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce it against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agencys discretion unless it restricts it and nothing requires the department , a Law Enforcement agency, to not enforce the law. Second, this was reasonable. Daca was a measure that could be rescinded at any time, and the departments reasonable concern about its legality and its general opposition to broad nonenforcement policies provided more than a reasonable basis for ending it. After all, an agency is not required to push its legally dubious power to not enforce the law to its logical extreme. Undermines competency in the rule of law itself and conflicts with the agencies Law Enforcement mission. I would like to begin with the review ability question. If the attorne
York america in august of 1619. Good evening. [ applause ] im k. C. Matthews, chief of staff here at the somebuchombur center poo center. Im obviously not kevin young. Listed in your program. Kevin has been looking forward to this event for ytwo years an upset hes not able to join us tonight. Kevin is not feeling well and not able to be here. He hopes to join us tomorrow and saturday for the remainder of the program and is watching along online. It is my honor tonight to welcome all of you who are here in the audience and welcome folks who are watching online as well. This is the Second Annual conference presented by our Lapidus Center for the study of transatlantic slavery. This morning Public Library and vch shomburg city event the historical analysis of transatlantic slavery. Youll hear more about and from mr. Lapidus shortly. This is a banner week for the Schomburg Center. Just a few things i want to mention to you. We and our director are part of a documentary, t rary premiered we