entrepreneur. case said they were determined to look at the evidence, not just courtroom theatre. everyone was very committed to going over the evidence and discussing each of the witnesses and he seemed like he was a very and each of the crucial pieces driven person. of evidence.in and that s definitely a quality that jennifer was looking for. jordanian-american paul zumot, sleek, attractive, educated, engaging. and it was crucial, they paul owned a local hangout, a decided, to compare very cafe. carefully the different time unusual place by north american lines claimed by the prosecution standards where customers could smoke flavored tobacco pipes called hookahs. and the defense. this man was a fan. so we analyzed the timeline he s a good-looking man. he looks good, smells good, he s for the entire day, from his witty, he s smart and he s just affectionate. so love at first sight? testimony where he said he was and then other pieces of well, maybe. said their friends. tes
that word guilty, man. and it was just like, this relief, this release of tension. i was very shocked by the verdict. i think a lot of people were shocked by the verdict. because i mean, if you sat through the weeks and weeks of trial. it just it s inconceivable how they could get to the result that they got to. but to the jurors, the issues about text messages and whether paul had jennifer s phone all afternoon wasn t as important as zumot on the stand. that s what made the difference. his tears, for example. sometimes i feel like i m too cynical, but it was universally held opinion, i think. the entire jury believed that it was a manufactured moment. what was the problem with his testimony? there were two things that struck me. one was when he broke down on the stand and to me it didn t seem genuine.
relief, this release of tension. i was very shocked by the verdict. i think a lot of people were shocked by the verdict. because i mean, if you sat through the weeks and weeks of trial. it just it s inconceivable how they could get to the result that they got to. but to the jurors, the issues about text messages and whether paul had jennifer s phone all afternoon wasn t as important as zumot on the stand. that s what made the difference. his tears, for example. sometimes i feel like i m too cynical, but it was universally held opinion, i think. the entire jury believed that it was a manufactured moment. what was the problem with his testimony? there were two things that struck me. one was when he broke down on the stand and to me it didn t seem genuine. and the other portion of his testimony was when he had the
because i mean, if you sat through the weeks and weeks of trial, it just it s inconceivable how they could get to the result that they got to. but to the jurors, the issues about text messages and whether paul had jennifer s phone all afternoon wasn t as important as zumot on the stand. that s what made the difference. his tears, for example. sometimes i feel like i m too cynical, but it was universally held opinion, i think. i think it was. the entire jury believed that it was a manufactured moment. what was the problem with his testimony? there were two things that struck me. one was when he broke down on the stand, and to me it didn t seem genuine. and the other portion of his testimony was when he had the opportunity to tell us where he was and what he was doing, he chose to basically lie to us three times. and we were able to prove he
trial. it just it s inconceivable how they could get to the result that they got to. but to the jurors, the issues about text messages and whether paul had jennifer s phone all afternoon wasn t as important as zumot on the stand. that s what made the difference. his tears, for example. sometimes i feel like i m too cynical, but it was universally held opinion, i think. the entire jury believed that it was a manufactured moment. what was the problem with his testimony? there were two things that struck me. one was when he broke down on the stand and to me it didn t seem genuine. and the other portion of his testimony was when he had the opportunity to tell us where he was and what he was doing, he chose to basically lie to us three times. and we were able to prove he lied to us by the hard evidence we had with the phone records