Receive gibson day in the city and county of San Francisco okay one second a resolution thank you steve disable donaldson in the castro will have his last day in castro and a founding magnet that helped San Francisco to transformer our approach to hiv care and other health needs of gay and bisexual and transz men i ask for your support in declaring steve gibson day in San Francisco. So is there another motion to move this item is purely commendatory okay moved by supervisor farrell and seconded by supervisor wiener laughter colleagues can we take that without objection . Without objection the motion passes unanimously and the second motion is that we need to take action came to the attendance after the agenda was posted supervisor wiener moved the item secondedcy supervisor farrell can we take that without objection . Without objection that passes unanimously and now i want to open up for Public Comment for the imperative item anyone wish to comment on item on the specifics of the impe
But the officers dont have any commercial talent. They must hire civilians who have money and who have commercial talent. So even though military unit managed the company and must run by civilians. For example i dont know the military title he carries out his commercial activities as official activities and they are producers picking and gathering. As hierarchical. Almost every organization in the party state commercially run companies to finance the expenditures in the early 1990s. Among them they have more than others. But they have no talent. They are giving them the status of the Public Officials. They come to the Public Officials and they should pay a certain amount of the due to the official private employee. Otherwise they are free and commercial activities and enjoy the protection and emphasize Public Authority as a public official. As a host of the National Information at work they have cell phones and they help each other in local cities and Exchange Information about how the
What is the proudest moment of your career so far . Guest wow. I dont mean to sound snarky or snippy here, but i hope it is yet to come. I feel very fortunate in just a few days well start our 12th season on pbs. Im now on 15 years in public radio. I feel very blessed at start of this year to do all weve done so far. I hope the proudest moment is yet to come. If i had to i hope the proudest moment is yet to come. If i had to pick something it would be that i am still in here and so many people that against me in so much of my life. When i started on npr some years ago i remember the complaint when i first started, that i talk too loud. My favorite was that my laugh was too boisterously last too boisterously. My laugh was too much mike haydns was wrong, i spoke too fast, it was too big for public radio. This is National Public radio and i started the bidding was i was not going to make it, 15 years on public radio. People didnt think, charlie rose had done well for years nobody expected
Reporters is very difficult. Very briefly i wanted to ask a question, the ed snowden disclosure for National Security is one very small area journalists report all over the world, at minimum, companies, private firms outside the Intelligence Community they may not go to jail for disclosing this but they have a mortgage to pay and a family to feed. Worst Case Scenario journalists i am lucky to live in a country where the worst happens, not saying it is a walk in the park, i get held in contempt. We are talking people dying and disappearing if this information is made out of sources of ours to disappear in the middle of the night because the question i have we talk about lawyers, from a legal perspective is what the surveillance needs for Attorney Client privilege and when the government does ims surveillance, how that is protected and that might work. Depends on what mass surveillance you have in mind. That is a hard question to answer. On the journalism question there has been too much
Donald ritie, thank you for ing with us on america history. The senate jority leader i not a position in the constitution. How did the job evolve . That puzzles a lot of people. We once had a former speaker of the house contact us and say i was the president pro perso ray in the pro tempore but not the majority leader because e speakers of e usee the nate majority leader as their equivalent, their functional equivalent on the senate side. Ofourse the speaker of the house is written ito the constution, and the president pro tempore is. But no mention of a majority leader or minority leader and thats because the constitutn did n ancipatepolitical parts. I think they thoughat it was probably gng to happen, but they didnwant to encoure litica parties. Theyake no provision for it. And for most ofthe history of thesenate we had no jority lead. Om 1789 until 1913 there was noajit leader ofth senate. There re chairmen committees who wld sort of take care of things on the floor, there were th a