and you and then you want to carry out your purpose. that purpose is to make sure it never happens to anybody again, and so with the guests when they were talking about this coalition that is now building, sadly, the coalition is building everyday, because more and more people are going through this. right, right. and i can tell you that in the end the nra is going to be no match for these folk, because they will address this issue until they die with a passion. so, i think that this point is so key. i want to come out to you, valerie, because the congressman is suggesting just what you suggested that there is something about the personal raw experience of loss that changes people as advocates. yes, whether it is children on a connecticut morning in a school or a sikh worshippers on a sunday morning or aft african-americans on a street coroner chicago, it is touching every single one of us in a deeply and personal and painful way. just now, we are finding a way to channel the
themselves with the government who held us down with water and attacked us with dogs and would not allow us to eat at their restaurants and could not own guns when fools with sheets on their head were riding across our lawns and murdering us. so we need guns to protect us from the klan? i mean, don t get me wrong, because there s a historical argument there, but it also feels like not in bridgeport, connecticut. or newtown. and joy-ann, helped me put a piece on the grio.com about this debate and the point i was making on the editorial is that this is a piece that is on the nra website, and you put an angry black man with a gun on the website, and there are not a lot of african-americans logging on with regularity and taps into white guys who are then prompted the go get guns. and if that is the person for