Of nido avenue; lot 033 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of continuance. Item 8a, at 550 tenth avenue has been with ron. Item 8b, at 550 tenth avenue, the variance proportion is proposed for continuance to september 25. I have no other items proposed for continuance and no speaker cards. When anyone from the public like to comment on these items . Come on up. Right now we are only taking comments on the matter of the continuance itself. Wanted to say, im a resident here in San Francisco, i am the bishop. I know that there are people that are against building, and construction of Housing Units for families here in San Francisco. I just want to remind them that this sort of anti building action we are taking Public Comment on the items being proposed for continuance. This is jet this is not general Public Comment period that will come up shortly. Okay. Commissioner moore. Im sorry, moved to continue. On that motion to continue items one and two acknowledge the wi
Item a1, 2017008431drp 2220 turk boulevard near the corner of nido avenue; lot 032 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of Building Permit application no. 2017. 0612. 9029 for the addition of three accessory dwelling units within the existing item a2, 2017008412drp. 2230 turk boulevard at the corner of nido avenue; lot 033 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of continuance. Item 8a, at 550 tenth avenue has been with ron. Item 8b, at 550 tenth avenue, the variance proportion is proposed for continuance to september 25. I have no other items proposed for continuance and no speaker cards. When anyone from the public like to comment on these items . Come on up. Right now we are only taking comments on the matter of the continuance itself. Wanted to say, im a resident here in San Francisco, i am the bishop. I know that there are people that are against building, and construction of Housing Units for families here in San Francisco. I just want to re
And as a city, we have reiterated policies that do that. So i dont want to do that to the businesses back there. So i do think theres some work that still could be done to relocate the entrance of the garage to harrison street. I think that at 120 , the extra b. M. R. Unit is not a b. M. R. Unit. I said this at the last hearing. The market rent for that apartment in the mission right now is just barely above 120 b. M. R. For the past couple of years, the a. M. I. Has been riding faster than the c. P. I. , which is what the rent control increase is based on. So i can see a scenario if things keep going this way, and in a couple of years that b. M. R. Unit will be more expensive than the market. First of all, its business address for your owner because theyre going to have an upside down unit and still have to rent it through the housing and go through the lottery, but to the community it doesnt benefit. So i would like to see, as commissioner hill has stated, more work on that, on provi
Have no other items proposed for continuance and i have no speaker cards. Does any member of the public have any Public Comment on the items requested for continuance . With that, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner koppel . Move to continue items one and two. Second. Thank you, commissioners. On that motion to continue the items as proposed. [roll call] so moved. That motion passes unanimously 5 0. Placing is under commission comments and questions. Commissioner moore . I read an interesting article in the journal speaking about demolition versus deconstruction in the city of palo alto. They have joined or taken the example from portland where the demolition of homes is not just simply a demolition anymore, but it is a systematic destruction of the structure to reuse, recycle, and alleviate excessive landfill due to demolition. This particular piece of legislation is going to affect how going to be in effect in palo alto in 2020 and affect commercial and residential buildings. It w
Th, 2019. And unlike previous weeks, i have no other items proposed for continuance and i have no speaker cards. Does any member of the public have any Public Comment on the items requested for continuance . With that, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner koppel . Move to continue items one and two. Second. Thank you, commissioners. On that motion to continue the items as proposed. [roll call] so moved. That motion passes unanimously 5 0. Placing is under commission comments and questions. Commissioner moore . I read an interesting article in the journal speaking about demolition versus deconstruction in the city of palo alto. They have joined or taken the example from portland where the demolition of homes is not just simply a demolition anymore, but it is a systematic destruction of the structure to reuse, recycle, and alleviate excessive landfill due to demolition. This particular piece of legislation is going to affect how going to be in effect in palo alto in 2020 and affect com