i love that. i was starting to join you. but you want me to cut it off now? my viewers are like, no. thank you good to see you, have a good one! a very good day to all of you from msnbc world headquarters here in new york. welcome everyone to alex witt reports. we begin to another new legal filing of the fbi search to mar-a-lago, this is in addition to the head spinning legal documents in the last few hours. the newest one is from donald trump himself. it s a supplemental failing to support trump s request for a special master to review items seized by the fbi. in its, trump s lawyers are also asking for more detailed receipts from items seized in the fbi search, arguing that the redacted affidavit provides almost no information that would allow trump to understand why the search took place. or what was taken from his home. they also argued that the presidential records act is not a criminally enforceable statute. and new reaction from both sides of the aisle to the relea
than one informant potentially within trump s inner circle, right? it sounds like there are a lot of informants, alex. and it is fascinating that the doj put this sentence front and center in this motion that accompanied the unsealing of the affidavit. the doj can t go out in public and hold press conferences and tell us what the information in the affidavit means, but they can speak through their pleadings. and i think this speaks very loudly. there had been a lot of speculation about who the informant was, or maybe there are a couple of informants. but the doj is saying that there are significant number of them, not one, not a couple, not a few. this sounds like there are a large number of people in mar-a-lago cooperating with the doj and perhaps people who all along without any form of proper security clearance would have had access to this information, as well. you have said before that the doj generally is prone to understatement.