two republicans on the committee. his questions about some of the most damning revelations so far during this hearing. congress and kinzinger said the former president told him cummaquid, just say that the president was corrupt, leave the rest to me and the republican cupboard and. a short time ago i spoke with congress and kinzinger about today s hearing, whether he thinks the former president directed the justice department to break the law. members of congress leading up to generate six? this is about trump s attempted weapon is the justice department, but it ended with the panel revealing the names of republican members of congress, who, witnesses say saw preemptive pardons from president trump, they include congressman mo brooks, matt gates, andy biggs, louis gomer, scott berry, perhaps marjorie taylor, these are sitting members of as a preventative, should they be censured? should they be removed from committees? what do you think? i think that is i guess, a dec
in that courage, honestly because of the other thing we have to keep in mind, and i kind of said this in my opening statement is, what would happen if something different happened in the future? what if any of those people would have said, we will put the department of justice stamp on your lies and conspiracy, this democracy will be in trouble but this isn t over, we are not out of the woods. donahue, the former deputy, acting deputy attorney general said that he told jeffrey clark , that clark was advocating cummaquid, nothing less than meddling in the outcome of an election. we also heard that clark was conducting his own investigation . take a listen to what we heard about voting machines. the idea that trump was telling jeffrey rosen to seize, you know, why haven t you seized the machine? in your view, do you think the committee presented evidence today, that trump directed the justice department to break the
greenblatt was a backer, i did ask him directly if jason greenblatt conducted any of these interviews that he said jason did not. he also said that he did, alex holder did all of the interviews. now, he said, he took offense to calling it a puff piece and he said he was very direct with him about wanting to spend time and wanted to talk about the administrator in, and the trump legacy. we have also been told by folks in the trump world, that they had been told that this was a puff piece, and that they had nothing to worry about and that they had complete editorial control over what went out. you have denied that. right? did they have complete editorial control, or any editorial control? no. they have not seen a single frame of my footage. ready think that is coming from? i have no idea. did you sell this to them as i puff up puff piece?