white students as well. the plaintiffs claimed the school put them at a disadvantage and valued black and latino students more highly. except, here s the thing. the league plantain in both the harvard and u.n.c. cases is an extra student at all. it is edward blum. now you might ask, what does bloom have to gain from meddling into the process of schools that he has nothing to do. with. and why is he putting the asian community at the center of this fight? especially when you consider that edward blum organization for four admissions has failed to present a single asian american student at trial. and 70% of asian americans are actually in favor of affirmative action. in fact, during plumes previous attentive knocking down the, policy in fischer versus university of texas at austin, more than 160 asian americans and pacific islander groups filed advocate briefs in support of affirmative action. despite a clear lack of support from the community that loom