covered and respect the dignity of their office and not turn it into an advertising hub for their private properties. so the boldness with which he uses is what turns stomachs so to speak? yeah. yeah. in many ways. the thing is he should have divested his properties but if he wasn t going to do that, there were so many things he could have done to mitigate the impact of the conflicting financial interests. he could have said i won t visit my properties and i won t talk about my properties and i won t let white house officials attend events at my properties. and that last one would have deterred foreign governments from trying to cut curry favor by holding events at his hotel in washington. but he has done quite the opposite. he has been visiting them as you put up the numbers, that is about a third of his time in office, has been at one of his properties and about a fourth of them has been spent golf. so this is the opposite of trying to scale back and not