conservatives of a moderate demeanor who are able to work across party lines. ryan s was to influence independent and swing voters. bill: there are a lot of comments from the right i was watching in the twitterverse last night and kreut advertise eupl of martha radice. i asked one of his leading advisers, he kicked that to the side. he said listen we ve won and we are not here to criticize anyone because of that. i thought that was probably a smart answer. ed rollins this was like being trapped in a bar next to a no it all drunk. doug schoen said biden was passionate, substantive, paul ryan was competent at best and no more. that s how the left sees it. i respectfully disagree with doug who is an astute person but
progressive in protecting gays. he has a pinch of trag ma advertise eupl. that s probably the only thing i ever heard out of robert gibbs mouth that i agreed with, they are a bunch of looneys. he s thrown a few bones to the national security, but basically he s a radical, radical leftist. megyn: do you feel like the american public when you see the approval ratings going down, do you feel like at least the independents are starting to feel if not as far as you do, but a little bit more they have more doubts at least about the hope and the change that he offered to bring. no question about it. they see him bullying people, they see eupl unpresident lee calling fat cat bankers. i ve seen insurance profits. they ought to be. it s surprising that 45% of the people are supporting him with the kind of destruction he s
solicitor general sparking kreut advertise eupl from critics. a senior white house are correspondent, major garrett is live on the north lawn. he has more for us. we have seen at least one senate republican, james imhoff of oklahoma saying he s going to vote against kagan. reporter: that happened yesterday afternoon when i was interviewing david axelrod. i put the question to him, what does how does someone so rapidly say they would vote against kagan, here is his take. it s hard to understand how someone in six hours could make a judgment about a nominee without talking to the nominee, without reviewing the kind of