Sincerely, i think you can see it pretty easily how blessed we are to have russ and hjose ad frankly every board member and b donor associated with this. We wouldnt be here without you. Were coming to the end of the speaking program. I give you the chance to re lla but also to secelebrate a littl bit. We now were going to do somethi something i dont know how were going to do this, but i do want to offer a few closing thanks and instructions. Flawl first of all , can we jut give our staff that work every day delivering food [ applause ]. Answering the phones, i just dont think none of us who dont do this work think about what it means to walk up buil buildings and six flights of stairs with food in our your hand and buildings with he wieor s that dont work and getting in and out of a car. We have pretsocial worker s goi trying to help people who literally have nothing and people who have challenges and so forth and we have a staff that back them up thats unparalleled. Again, my deep ees
Ease stand by] supervisor mandelman to implement ab 1784, so id like to make a motion to add that language. President yee okay. Theres a motion to amend. Is there a second . Seconded by supervisor peskin. If theres no objection, then well take these amendments outlined. [gavel]. President yee colleagues, can we take this item, same house, same call, as amended . Seeing no objection, then, this resolution passes unanimously. [gavel]. President yee number 62. Clerk 62 is a resolution to support the rights of San Francisco veterinary specialists. President yee supervisor ronen . Supervisor ronen yes. I am so proud to have the cosponsorship of every single colleague on this board. Thank you so much for standing by these workers. As i stated last week, sfvs is owned by v. C. A. , a company that owns 800 animal hospital. In 2018, v. C. A. Was purchased by mars, the candy company. The next step is for the company and union to negotiate a contract. That started 14 months ago, but unfortunately
Always telling me this and its not something that im very comfortable talking about, but that the sthian Francisco Human Rights Commission was created because there were people that were trying to buy cars that werent allowed to buy them in this city, and those people were black people. Sometimes as we do this work, i would say africanamerican afri s and peopblack ipeople in San Francisco felt like we were continuing to forget about them and continuing to repeat bwhy Te Commission was created in the first place. So as we secelebrate the 55th anniversary of the Human Rights Commission, as we remember the 5 55th anniversary of the civil rights act, i was challenged and really encouraged to revisit why the Human Rights Commission was created and to pause during this time. Somebody says, who selcelebrats5 years . I guess we do. [ applause ]. It is an off year, but im going into my third year at the Human Rights Commission and i felt like this was a good tooim to pause and recognize the int
Unfortunately, i believe there were several inaccuracies to that article. One of which is that the issue of glare is not unique to the l. R. P. Four or the fact that we use cameras instead of mirrors. The glare is most acute at west portal, which is why 15 years ago, we actually put up a convex mirror to provide additional availability visibility for our operators, which is part of how they are currently trained. [please stand by] we have, as part of the costing package that we originally brought to you, we have some place holder costs for what we anticipate things to be, so Something Like the flat wheels, which is an issue that both operators and mechanics have been raising for a long time are already built into that overall package that we brought, and at this time, we do not anticipate that package changing significantly, but theres still a lot of work to do as we get to those final estimates. So thats essentially where we are today. I know you had a long meeting, so i wont i wont g
Generated today about rule 20, to make two essential points. Number one, that obviously what is going on here by the way, rule 20 funds are generated by a charge to our utility bills, so everybody. So essentially whats been going on here for the last 12, 14 years is we, those who dont have undergrounding, have been paying for paying out of our utility bills for those people who have undergrounding. This drove our coalition to not try to find certain sections of the city that would get undergrounded, but the only equitable thing to be done is to have citywide undergrounding which is the master plan. On the issue of is undergrounding better to leave the wires up, 100,000 frenchmen cant be wrong. San diego is doing this at 12 to 15 miles a year and have been doing it for the last 10 or 12 years. Santa barbara is doing it. Berkley has commissioned a study to underground if theyre going to be doing it. I mean, the proof in the pudding is very much in the knowing here. Not only as supervisor