all adults and teenagers on the list. her family says this puts kids at the back of the line. it certainly makes it less likely that they re going to get organs from adults, but, again, the reason they ve done that is because of concerns that the transplants may not be effective. you re always going to be weighing the decisionmaking how to allocate organs, issues about effectiveness and fairness. if it turns out that using adult organs in younger children isn t as likely to be successful, that would obviously be very problematic. as evidence accumulates, you know, revisits these issue ls about allocation. so you wouldn t want it, for example, transplant an adult organ into a child where there s a very high probability of failure and lungs that could have gone to another patient to where you might have had a much higher probability of success. obviously this will be revisited again in that hearing on the 14th. we ll see what happens. meanwhile, an important discussion. thank you, si
shepard: doctors had said wit a traplant sarah could and like bli die within weeks. but childors are quite rar and federal policy prevents children under the age of 12 receiving adult organ that organ.ther adult needs asked sebel to change that rule. the pariled a lawsuit. they sought a he resraining ordt would pre secretary sebeliusrom enforcing the rule. and now the judge has granted it harris faulkner has been tracking developments and she is live in our newsroom in new york. ris? that video says it all, doesn t it, sh this order by this u.s. district cou judge gives sarah s doctors 10 days it to find a donor. when there is a court14th hearing on t matter. here is the family s reaction in a statent moments ago. quote: for us, this means that for the next 10 days sarah s placement is in the