but you don t sweat the small stuff when you re dying. reporters found the only painkiller in town. during the night, they would come and bring a bottle of rum and that s how i got through the night. sipping on a bottle of rum. jerry parks worries were getting worse. before night came, we came back to the jungle. started hollering for the kids and no response. they never came. they said they did but we went so far we couldn t hear their voices. i thought, oh, my god, don t tell me they re lost. next die with a degree of dignity. lay down your life with dignity. don t lay down with tears and agony. the end of jonestown. ? 20? new purina one true instinct has 30. active dogs crave nutrient-dense food. so we made purina one true instinct. learn more at purinaone.com
been discussed? yeah. unfortunately, police in canada, unlike u.s. police and prosecutors, don t lay out the elements of the case until it comes to trial. so it s very murky. the route of the train i believe is from new york to toronto. somewhere along that route, possibly right at the border, there was a feeling they could derail the train, but we have no concrete elements of how this plot would have gone down, and there s been no recovery of bomb or bomb materials. so, again, whether this was an aspirational attack, it could be. police just said nothing was imminent. look, you re a national security reporter there, how much of a threat is radical islam in canada? it s a good question. i mean, how much of a threat is radical islam in the united states, in europe?
chairman of the faith and freedom coalition. ralph, thank you for coming on. you bet, chris, good to be with you again. i m setting it up what looks to be the direction of the court. a narrow decision. perhaps just dealing with california. perhaps positively for the pro-choice or the pro-same-sex marriage community. how do people on the conservative side, how will you react to that? what will be your plan? well, if that were to happen, and, of course, this is not my first rodeo. i know it s not yours. adon t lay down a lot of bets on oral arguments. it s hard to interpret how the court is going to rule based on the oral arguments. if they were to do that, chris, i think it would be profoundly disappointing. the people of california voted not once, but twice that they wanted marriage defined between a man and a woman. i think this kind of issue, as we saw with the very polarizing and highly divisive issue of roe v. wade is best left to people and elected representatives.