considered what would have been justice for barack turner? well, i think it is startin with asking the person who had the harm from brock turner what would havebeen justice? mental health support? would it have been, you know some kind of apology and admittance of what he did? you know, and in addition to potentially prison time. but the way that our system is set up, it doesn t take into consideration the, even for th victims, the survivors, what i necessary for healing them would it have been more tha six months i mean, in some ways that i a question that, you know, i certainly can t answer i don t know what th appropriate time is for this particular offense but i think we need to chang what the conversation is about, again,, what is healing in what is justice there are a lot o individuals in the legal syste in california, i was i
in his reply to the prime minister s letter, nadhim zahawi said he had been concerned about the conduct of the press towards him. he added that it was the privilege of his life to serve in government. mr zahawi s life story is an incredible one. this will be a devastating chapter to look back on. katy balls is the political editor of the spectator. what do you make of nadeem zaha we s letter to the prime minister. there is no reference to his tax affairs and certainly no apologies nadhim zahawi s letter. it and certainly no apologies nadhim zahawi s letter- zahawi s letter. it begs the question zahawi s letter. it begs the question that zahawi s letter. it begs the question that it zahawi s letter. it begs the question that it does - zahawi s letter. it begs the question that it does not i zahawi s letter. it begs the i question that it does not refer zahawi s letter. it begs the - question that it does not refer to the tax affairs other than to criticise the press for unea
take than documents. that is a very different take than what we had, that he did not know take than what we had, that he did not know it take than what we had, that he did not know it was there, and now it is an admittance that the documents were misplaced, so a lot of questions still need to be answered. petei’, questions still need to be answered. peter, jennifer is absolutely right. if you as the former national security adviser had taken home some documents and we found them in your home several years later, you would be in a lot of trouble. be in a lot of trouble. yeah, i would be be in a lot of trouble. yeah, i would be in be in a lot of trouble. yeah, i would be in a be in a lot of trouble. yeah, i would be in a lot of be in a lot of trouble. yeah, i would be in a lot of trouble. l be in a lot of trouble. yeah, i would be in a lot of trouble. i would would be in a lot of trouble. i would probably would be in a lot of trouble. i would probably be would be in
without title 42 and lobbying against title 42, trying to repeal it and look at it and say this is what we owe them. we owe them admittance in the country with no plan to take care of them when they get here. buses landing in d.c. in the teens weather. even at the border it s really cold. but, governor greg abbott has mobilized who he can. and so we have soundbite here or a video here from age in general ronald burkett on it texas military working over christmas this morning. they are focused on deterrence and sending a message that unlawful crossings is not an option. you have got go to the poe and the way they rolled out this morning what they re doing is just incredibly impressive. the whole dod. state guard and air army army guard coming together and demonstrating we can be where we need to be anywhere on this border. we can surge in a very short
for the justice department. he had a mission to fulfill, by his own admittance. the other thing, part of the share of concluding has his transcript is wild s, it did not affect me at all. there s a reason that the media, an american public, were given the cassidy hutchinson testimony, about the ways in which trump appointees, and trump affiliates, were coached to say, i do not recall when they were under pressure to give damning evidence against donald trump. are you reading these tea leaves the same way? the fact that we are primed with this knowledge from cassidy hutchison, and then given a transcript from someone. where he says, repeatedly, i do not recall, i don t recall, i don t recall? that is the inference people wants the committee to draw when you flip from cassidy hutchison, and her explanation, to ken klukowski. there are some moments in there you, slap your head and say, how do you not recall? there was questions about, were