she will tell lawmakers whether their stories posed a risk to national security. bill has time off. good morning, trace. moon to mar-a-lago might be the scene of today s show. house oversight leaders welcoming the dni s decision saying officials must swiftly move to mitigate any potential risk. at the same time federal judge is siding with the former president saying she intends to appoint an independent special master to review how the f.b.i. handled the documents. dana: all this after the f.b.i. unsealed a heavily redacted affidavit showed the agency had probable cause to believe that the former president was keeping classified information at his resort. some of it apparently dealing with spies and secrets. bill: former congressman trey gowdy is making the case for more transparency. perhaps some people have already made up their minds. but many have not. they want more information. is this really about the return of documents or something else? what is at stake are
here. stick around to see meaningful space speak mode to learn everything you need to know about the artemis 1 launch. then, for decades, the antiabortion movement had most of us convinced we were living in a so-called pro-life country. let s just marketing. a fall, overall americans are learning the truth about abortion. spoiler, alert abortion rights are popular. how we got to where we are and what it means for this year s elections, ahead. velshi starts now. good morning, it is sunday august 29th. i am ali velshi. for about a full year after donald trump left the white house, 184 unique classified documents totaling more than 700 pages of valuable intelligence reflectivity u.s. government was sitting at his palm beach resort in mar-a-lago. that batch was recovered in january of this year. since, then the national archives in the justice department have received even more classified material from trump this state. including, during a search of mar-a-lago three weeks ago. so
but many have not. they want more information. is this really about the return of documents or something else? what is at stake are two foundational beliefs that no one is above or beneath the law, not even former presidents. number two, similar facts should lead to similar outcomes. justice should be the same for everyone. and never be used as a political weapon. dana: david spunt is reporting live from the justice department. good morning, david. good morning. dni admiral hayes will be meeting with congress at some point after assessing some of these documents, hundreds of classified documents taken from mar-a-lago the white house to mar-a-lago during the trump presidency. several members of congress are told that haines and the
consequences or changes to the system? and will the results of that review ever become public knowledge? i am joined now a pulitzer prize-winning investigative journalist david roe, who is the editor of new york where the commented msnbc contributor. deep the fbi the cia in the truth about america s deep state. also joining us is one of the best source journalist comes to matters of national security, charlie savage. pulitzer prize-winning washington correspondent for the new york times. also msnbc contributor. welcome to both of you. thank you for being. here dave, let me start with you. everything we just talked about, admiral hayes, odni, investigating the potential dangers. none of this is about whether donald trump did anything without information. it is the idea that very important information was insecure, meaning, something could happen. that could range from donald trump doing something nefarious without like selling or trading it or something. and it could mean somebody jus
early august turned up at least some documents marked tc ts sihai. a top level of security and classification that former longtime doj official andrew weissmann recently described in an op-ed as, quote, the crown jewel of the national security community. now, the intelligence community will review the potential harm that trump s improper handling and storage of these materials may have created. yesterday we found out that admiral hayes, the director of national intelligence or dni has told tropical makers in the house oversight and house intelligence committee that her office will leave, quote, an assessment of the potential risk to national security that would result from the disclosure of relevant documents. the office of the dni will review what types of information and white human sources could be compromised, if those documents had fallen into the wrong hands. but how will the agency actually conduct that investigation? and it will result in