Test the only the way that i come at that aspect is why are you using it for . Right. Because its like i said, youre not convincing anybody with that argument. Theres nobody who is against impeachment who can be turned to impeachment because the federal system. In fact, there is nobody, i believe, there is nobody against impeachment that can be turned towards impeachment because impeachment is no longer a legal or political issue. It is a social issue. Like donald trump is your team. He is on your white supremacist team and youre going to go with that or not. I dont know that tis argument while it is a good one, is effective at changing anybodys mind who hasnt already made their mind up about impeachment. Just to respond to your yes, i think i heard two questions. One is, do we win and the other one is, does he get removed . Im going to kind of separate those out and im going to reframe who we are. If im again, if i can speak from the ukrainian experience, be not only because of the cu
Topics panel on the appeasement of President Trump. Coleman, andancis i will be your moderator. We have a distinguish set of panelists who will discuss the impeachment of President Trump from a political and diplomatic perspective. We have a video presentation. I will begin with a short introduction of our panelists. Each will speak for 10 to 15 minutes after each has spoken, we will open it up so they can have reaction to each others presentation, and then we will open it up to questions from the audience. We have professor frank bowman, who is the Floyd R Gibson endowed professor of law at the university of missouri. He is also the author of a recent book, high crimes and misdemeanors a history of impeachment before mr. Trump. He is also the author of a blog, Impeachable Offenses. We have dr. Monica f injured. As an anthropologist of model, her extension of work on private property and ukraine is book,sis for her current property and oligarchy. She works in the u. S. , ukraine, and o
Extensive fieldwork on the creation of privacy and post soviet ukraine is the basis for her current work on property and al arche. Teaching and other jurisdictional, property theory, diplomacy, property law and the law of four. Working with ukraine on ukrainian issues for 25 years started before she became a legal scholar. During her time which included a two or of duty at the u. S. Embassy. He is the executive editor of above the law. A frequent commentator. We are looking forward to a very exciting panel with divergent views and takes on the impeachment process. Our first panelist will be from the professor. Constitutionally sufficient charges. Greetings to everyone in washington. I am frank. Circumstances are such that unfortunately i could not be with you in washington today. The organizers of this panel were kind enough to submit this short film in lieu of a personal appearance. Here are some thoughts on impeachment. Sometime in the next few weeks the effort to impeach and remove
Good morning. Welcome to the subcommittee on communication and technologies. Well, good morning, everyone. And welcome to the subcommittee on communication and technologies hearing on accountability and oversight of the federal communications commission. I am glad to welcome our witnesses back before the subcommittee. I know it has been serve months since we had you before us and i know that you have all missed the warm welcoming atmosphere of our hearing room. But despite that passage of time, many issues that were of concern to us then still remain unresolved today. For example, i asked about the investigation into phone carriers selling the realtime location of nearly every american. Mr. Chairman, you told me that even after more than a year had passed, we still couldnt tell whether this practice had stopped. Couldnt say whether the impacted individuals had been notified. Couldnt tell us if members of congress and Law Enforcement had their locations sold or tracked. In june of this
Also asked about a recent report found coverage status admitted to the fcc by various wire carriers to be an accurate and how the commission was planning to respond. Good morning. Welcome to the subcommittee on communication and technologies. I am glad to welcome our witnesses back before the subcommittee. I know it has been seven months since we had you before us and i know we all missed the warm welcoming atmosphere of our hearing room. Despite that passage of time many issues that were of concern to us then still remain unresolved today. For example, i asked about the investigation into phone carrier selling the realtime location of nearly every american. Mr. Chairman, you told me even after more than one year had passed we still cannot tell whether this practice has stopped and could not say whether the impacted individuals have been notified and could not tell us that members of congress and lawenforcement had their locations sold or tracked and in june of this year you told senat