Be disconcertingly at times authoritarian in his actions. At the very least favoring unilateralism. We begin tonight with the president s plan to legalize more than 5 million Illegal Immigrants with his executive fiat as early as next week. The white house confirming last night that the president has decided not to wait for congress. No, it does not mean the president will wait. The timing of the president s decision is not nearly as significant as the decision that is facing House Republican leaders. About whether they want to continue to block Bipartisan Legislation that is already passed the senate. Lou the new Republican Senate Leadership Today warned the white house about ignoring the will of the American People and the importance of not infringing on the constitutional balance of powers. I cant think of anything more discouraging that the president of the United States could do know that what senator mcconnell mentioned, and that is threaten to issue this executive amnesty order
Be disconcertingly at times authoritarian in his actions. At the very least favoring unilateralism. We begin tonight with the president s plan to legalize more than 5 million Illegal Immigrants with his executive fiat as early as next week. The white house confirming last night that the president has decided not to wait for congress. No, it does not mean the president will wait. The timing of the president s decision is not nearly as significant as the decision that is facing House Republican leaders. About whether they want to continue to block Bipartisan Legislation that is already passed the senate. Lou the new Republican Senate Leadership Today warned the white house about ignoring the will of the American People and the importance of not infringing on the constitutional balance of powers. I cant think of anything more discouraging that the president of the United States could do know that what senator mcconnell mentioned, and that is threaten to issue this executive amnesty order
And looked, i believe, more closely and probingly at effectiveness and again concluded that the program came up short. But those two questions, what is the Legal Foundation and what is the effectiveness despite all of that structure i believe they never really got in 10 years of this program adequate attention. I want to take the prerogative of the chair to observe in response to senator whitehouses point that none of the oversight was adversarial in nature. Which is why i propose the constitutional advocates. Courts always do better when they hear both sides, the process is well served when there is contention as there was within this board. Might just point out that the dissent by ms. Brand says in commenting on whether the board should consider the legal question as you very thoughtfully observed and im quoting, this legal question will be resolved by the courts not by this board, which does not have the benefit of traditional adversarial legal briefing and is not particularly well
Span3 out a coverage deal on cspan3. Democrats, dial 202 5853880, republicans 202 5853881, and independents, all others 202 5853882. Also, send us a tweet cspanwj, or jointly cumbers comers asian on facebook. Com cspan, or join the conversation on facebook. Com cspan. It isntolson says president obamas fault that these companies have offered substandard plants designed to be revoked. Clinton has been a good social club soldier, but he should recognize that he is wrong here. Sheryl says they are moving toward total Government Health care that is what they have wanted all along. Says the on affordable obama act is collapsing more and more everyday. You know when feinstein jumps ship, the holding is thinking. I love it. Deb says paving the way for hillary, goes with whatever that centers at the time. We want to get your thoughts this morning. What do you make a president clinton saying to president obama you need to keep your promise on Peoples Insurance coverage . While we wait for your
Object to the existence of a quorum. We dont have to debate the her its of it. Theres an open question about the consequence. Okay. A professor at my law school, Washington College of law and an expert in constitutional law and many other things. Runs the sjd program there and an expert in issues related to race and the Supreme Court. We did have one really important race related case this term thats kind of gotten buried and lost in the shuffle. Maybe decided earlier. But it tells us a fair amount i think about where the court is at on the questions and relates to other cases that you can discuss, im sure. The schutte case, the voters of michigan announced they were going to change the constitution to forbid affirmative action, including particularly racebased affirmative in Higher Education and some other things and had the consequence of overruling a prior question saying the Michigan Law School could take race into account for admissions. And so, the court was presented with a ques