We had a certified inspector come out and clear it. Okay. And then another any other items that i can think of, no. I talked about the compromise, okay. Any other questions . I hope i clarified it a little bit about phase 1 and phase ii of this project and where were going. Commissioners may have questions for you. Okay, great. Thank you. Thank you. Dr requester, you have a twominute rebuttal. I would like you to turn to page 8 of my presentation which shows when we moved the angle of the vertex of the angle back into the center of the bedroom where Children Play and read, the light the angle shall the span through which the light enters the room is reduced from 25 to 0 which means no light reaches the center of the room and this is in beyond to the reference revised drawings with the four graduated to 8 feet back angle building i would also like to direct you to page 10 where i wanted to make the point that the sponsor has a history demonstrating disregard for regulations has violatio
It is on file with joe [speaker not understood] with the sfdph, okay, total clearance support. We had a certified inspector come out and clear it. Okay. And then another any other items that i can think of, no. I talked about the compromise, okay. Any other questions . I hope i clarified it a little bit about phase 1 and phase ii of this project and where were going. Commissioners may have questions for you. Okay, great. Thank you. Thank you. Dr requester, you have a twominute rebuttal. I would like you to turn to page 8 of my presentation which shows when we moved the angle of the vertex of the angle back into the center of the bedroom where Children Play and read, the light the angle shall the span through which the light enters the room is reduced from 25 to 0 which means no light reaches the center of the room and this is in beyond to the reference revised drawings with the four graduated to 8 feet back angle building i would also like to direct you to page 10 where i wanted to mak
Demolished. And the proposed construction is two large modern boxy condos, flagrantly different in character than the classic San Francisco arc tech taur that surrounds it so i ran around last night and took photos of all the buildings on our street, if we can bring that up just to give you a feel. Thats one building, a bunch of victorians. The building on the bottom right is the proposed construction according to the permit holders renderings. They arent uniformly victorian, but they do have a uniform feel of old standing San Francisco. Not only does the construction on the bottom right not really fit in, you might be willing it say its not that obtrusive, its just sort of there, maybe its not a perfect match, but unfortunately looking carefully at the renderings and the plans provided, the renderings dont actually match the plans. If i can forward, id like to point out that the building is actually significantly higher than it is as rendered. If you notice, look at the North Building
Numerousity of issues that were brought does create a certain level of complexity that for those of us who arent as trained in these issues, it was helpful it hear more discussion of it today. Like Vice President fung, i agree that the permit should be upheld for many of the reasons he stated. I didnt find, i found at this point the position of the permit holder persuasive. Make a motion . Move to uphold the department and the permit. You need grounds . If you care to articulate. On the grounds it is code compliant. Thank you. We have a motion from the Vice President to deny both appeals, uphold this permit on the basis that it is code compliant. On that motion. roll called . Thank you, the vote is 40, this permit is upheld. Okay, thank you. President wong wong, hwang, would you like me to call the next item. I think we should take a short break. He welcome back to the october 17 meeting of the San Francisco board of appeals. We are now calling ate a through 8d, appeal numbers 12105 th
Offices. There are a number of issues that you have to address in washington, National Security issues that come up. It is generally a series of meetings. What has driven us in the last 10 years is the threat of terrorism. That is why we spend the first hour or two everyday addressing terrorism. People ask about how we manage it. Occasionally say, not very well. There are those who think i should not be micromanaging. Management books will tell you that shyou should be on the balcony and of the dance floor. I agree with that generally. The two areas where if you spin attention on that you hope we will not mess up too badly, one of them is terrorism. I have to be knowledgeable to respond to questions that president obama has, as i did for president bush. That means making certain my organization puts me in a position to respond to that. The other area i have not done as good a job is on bringing in information technology. Early on, we were putting in new Case Management system in. I did