he emerged today, of course, refusing to take any questionse to defend his department s actions. visa v former president.ia my role is completelysp consistenteak on with regulatios that set forth the responsibilities of , e attorney general underco the special counsel regulations, and i followed thos te regulations. lau look, let sra be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or? are you part of a political operation to get a conviction 81% mp by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believeof reb about all you know. this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructivvee presidentsha the united states has ever had. joe biden. and they rjoe bide e now consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be a a.g. if he didn t hadn t greenlitlig a special prosecutor. this case, everyone at msnbc and cnn believes that garland tu is trying to put trump in jailt. no matter where the facts lead. otherwise they
learned in law school. it does. and thisl. is one of the thingsi i believe this case, there s going to be seriouses in the pretrial stage over prosecutorial misconduct by this teaml stag, which could entirely upend this case. we may never get to a trial, ve may never actually have to address any of o addrthe substantivese becauseh the misconduct of jack smith and his team. do smith an believe that he has a plan to go after the presidentre ,new jersey, where his bedmins bedminster minster club is. that was floated on cnnd el and elsewhere that i don t believe. i mean, something thate indi they already put in this indictment about thactt thatound conversation. they ve never found the document that would that would be associated with that conversation. onversatand so to try and bringt as a separate case there, it would be consolidated anyway.e p there d be a double jeopardy issue because it s already alleged in this indictmentar . do you agree with my comments on the angle that these