have to do this as you ve noted. and they can change the rule easily. should we expect them the do that, would it be better for them to do that? or would this charade continue to be exposed by letting it sit? well, the choice is twofold. mitch mcconnell can say if you re not going to send him over, i don t care. we re not going to deal with it. nancy pelosi could then use it as a codgel to hit trump over the head at every turn. add things to it. simply change the rule, hold a trial, do it on your own terms. you know? the constitution doesn t say the sole power to trial impeachment with the consent and advice of nancy pelosi. it did you wa it doesn t say . that s the big deal. sarah, in fact, all of this is politics. we know this. and the republicans are concerned about what s happening here. but we as the citizens with concerned about how the constitution is being shredded at this point and made a mockery
the constitution that says they have to do this, as you ve noted.d. and they can change the rule easily. should we expect them the do that? would it be better for them to do that? or would this charade continue to be exposed by letting itt si? well, the choice is twofold. mitch mcconnell can say, well, if you re not going to send them over, i don t care. we re not going to deal with it. nancy pelosi could then use it as a cudgel to hit trump over the head at every turn. tammy: add things to it. simply change the rule, hold a trial, do it on your own terms. you know? the constitution doesn t say the sole power to trial impeachment with the consent and advice of nancy pelosi. it doesn t say that. tammy: that s the big deal. sara, in fact, all of this is politics. we know this. and the republicans are concerned about what s happening here. but we, as the citizens, are concerned about how the constitution is being shredded
the constitution that says they have to do this as you ve noted. and they can change the rule easily. should we expect them the do that, would it be better for them to do that? or would this charade continue to be exposed by letting it sit? well, the choice is twofold. mitch mcconnell can say if you re not going to send him over, i don t care. we re not going to deal with it. nancy pelosi could then use it as a codgel to hit trump over the head at every turn. add things to it. simply change the rule, hold a trial, do it on your own terms. you know? the constitution doesn t say the sole power to trial impeachment with the consent and advice of nancy pelosi. it did you wa it doesn t say . that s the big deal. sarah, in fact, all of this is politics. we know this. and the republicans are concerned about what s happening here. but we as the citizens with concerned about how the constitution is being shredded
given to congress last may. i assume he keeps saying they re terrorists, there s no terrorist threat from the southern border. first of all, there s multiple problems with the southern border. one thing we learned on 9/11, even if it is a handful of terrorists, we don t want to be in a situation saying why didn t we do something about it. whether it is a thousand or 500. a wall will keep out terrorists. honestly, john brayburn let s add things. last year in america, 100,000 americans were rushed to er from heroin. three-quarters of it comes in from the southern border. there s 20,000 children in central america and mexico that are being pushed to america that are part of sex trafficking. we have that problem. then you talk about gangs. go to long island. talk about the children killed in long island by gangs that are
but we d have to see a reason, an excuse, some reason why it was omitted. this is this is na form thats supposed to be submitted with a complete accounting, that tells you up front there s a penalty of perjury on it, and maybe you have a chance to change, to add things that you ve forgotten later, but you don t forget dozens of meetings with foreign officials, especially when that subject has been in the news about other officials. so, we ll see how the fbi responds. i do want to talk to you about health care, because there s a lot going on. we know this, the government gives money to insurance companies to help reduce the cost of premiums for low-income americans. that is part of obamacare. our latest reporting is that democrats are planning to tie that money to keeping the government to the government funding bill that has to be passed at the end of the month. if that money isn t in there, congressman, are you prepared to shut the government down?