Saying anything directly about the interview before so that is clear he felt that was inappropriate. According to her. Shell is said the president did not want to bat in general tally with the line of succession by that she clarified she meant that mr scarr amici have the arrangement way he could report directly to the president and mr kelly is coming in to tighten adult so kelly is coming in to tighten adult so that they would put the president threw him and to survey the mr trump felt, according to the spokeswoman, but she did not want the buddha mr kelly with. Those were the two reason she gave. Also, interestingly, she said it was a decision that was made mutually among the three people, the president , mr kelly and Anthony Scaramucci and also she was asked about the reporting, she said that eve ryo ne about the reporting, she said that everyone at the white house would report to mr kelly rather than direct to the president and she was asked several that mean everybody does it mean
number in syria here it seems if this is indeed israel, israel once again, choosing to be quiet and this is a policy they had followed for many, many years, not talking about actions and strikes that they would carry out in syria sometimes in iraq, there were a number of reasons for that. one of those was simply not to be seen as boasting or bragging about an attack, not to add insult to injury. so potentially, israel, once again, following that policy right now, aware of not only how sensitive the entire situation in the region is, but also the desire of the united states, not to see the situation escalate any more here. now the question of explosions in syria and iraq, if israel were to have attack act iran, how would they do so? knowing that some of the countries that aided in the defense from the iranian attack several days ago, did not want to see anything coming through their airspace. once again, jordan, for example, would be an example of that. so how would israel, if it wanted
north progress to date to get justice north durham. a lot has been done, but there north durham. a lot has been done, but there is north durham. a lot has been done, but there is as we all know a lot more to but there is as we all know a lot more to do but there is as we all know a lot more to do. the horizon scandal is quite more to do. the horizon scandal is quite simply more to do. the horizon scandal is quite simply one of the most egregious miscarriages ofjustice in british egregious miscarriages ofjustice in british history. something which robs people of their lives, their liberty robs people of their lives, their liberty and their livelihoods. driven liberty and their livelihoods. driven by the misguided belief that technology was infallible and workers dishonest. the post office prosecuted innocent people, causing unimaginable pain and suffering which unimaginable pain and suffering which no unimaginable pain and suffering which no amount of compensation ca
accommodate the migrants. now looking at fort wadsworth, a national park tomp add insult to injury, the park, many families are attached to the coast guard. we did an awareness campaign to raise money and goods and diapers for young military families who can t afford to feed their kids and put diapers on and the government is spending 50 million to possibly put migrants on fort wadsworth. it is out of control. the average annual fee to accommodate migrants is $140,000 for a family. that is more than the average household of people of staten island. laura: can you imagine if american families that don t watch fox or that don t read the few websites that report the truth on this, they don t even