they are moving and adaptable regardless of the situation. they make the money mostly through taking hostages in north africa. one of the high profile cases was a hostage edwin dire murdered after lengthy negotiations for the release stalled. at the state department, the u.s. ambassador to libya characterized al-qaeda this way. it s clear that the hqim is a danger to the region. ambassador who was pulled back from the post in tripoli suggest that gaddafi may be overplaying the threat. it s clearly a card he thinks he can get benefit of. patently ridiculous. do we have concerns? certainly we do. this week, one of al-qaeda important religious scholars hiding in pakistan released a statement supporting the overthrow of gaddafi. the issue is whether that will make it easier for them to gate foothold in northwest africa. in washington, catherine
output and any small variance results in $20 billion sucked out of the system because it s so rigid. the other version of technology is not to emphasize hyper efficiency with a few people s benefit but to emphasize hyper adaptability which is also possible with that technology, but threatens the profits of those who send the vast fortunes that they make to our politicians, 40% of all political donation come from the banking sector. the next biggest donor is from the health care monopolies. how are politicians going to do the right thing on release the adaptable, the adaptive potential of technology and forfeit the rhetoric of rigid efficiency that lines their pockets? i estimate that less than 1% of the global population is actually actively promoting the deregulation of finance and trade. they are completely linked.
x-rays that see through your skin? it s beside the point. if we ve got smart people, don t put them on body scanners, put them to work on how to protect considering oarks either cargo that gets put on aircraft designed to be did the nated over cities and large urban areas or cargo that is shipped by ups, other cashiers, and is put on civilian aircraft, where passengers are. that s where the next problem is going to be. and al-qaeda is just doing a dry run. bill: why don t we get that? i don t know. generals they re fighting the last war. we need to be proactive and think ahead of al-qaeda because they ve shown themselves to be resilient, adaptable. we close off one area like hijackers, they go to another area, we close off commercial aircraft with civilian passengers, they go to cargo aircraft. what we need to do is be a step ahead, but we re not. bill: i understand your argument. that is the legitimate debate, but what about the concerns that we re hearing from airports across t
worst recessions we ve had in the world. this is unique. we re still the most adaptable, most flexible, we have the best educational system in this country. i m not saying we don t have problems in this country. i don t think it s have you been to china? yes, have i been to china 15 times, thank you very much. you don t come back with what everybody else says? no. they have one-fourth expenditure on education we do. i wish i felt the way you do. well, i don t want to underestimate go to china with mort. reverend al, tell us more about your conference. we re going to deal with education, something you and i certainly agree on, that we ve got to reform education and make it work. and he ll be there today. by the way, is he going to have the courage to keep fighting to stand up to the special interests that put adults over kids in schools? i think he will. i think he s made it clear. i think the president s made it clear. and i think that this is something that c