i stand behind what was said that sometimes you award new ones to come in and maybe more refined. maybe a little more under control. and then otherwise you are dealing with the ones before. and they are not threatened by a competitor that could be putting a better product out for everyone. so i did not to keep from proliferation and went with the 100 feet. commissioner. i like staff s argument but we don t know who the next bar will be. and we probably authorized those c.u. s for the ones that are the problem. allowing more competition is fine. but no guarantee that the next person coming along and we give a c.u. according to the staff proposal. isn t going to end up a year later bussing in people from sf state. or something like that. i don t know if that s where they come from. but in any case i am leaning towards commissioner antonini s motion or mr. hillus idea. let s talk about that. commissioner hillus. just a clarification. i more interested in the sunseting