because the president and the there is no god-given right for electricity. is it the god-given right for the president to increase them 30%. and no we have a right no, no, no his decision. right to the epa. that is not a debate. there is a rule-making process. there no rule-makeing proces, and it is his process, and ben stein, that is my fear, it is his rule by edict. well, everything is his rule. first of all, adam to the contrary notwithstanding by no means all scientists believe that there is a global warming caused by manmade effects. by no means does scientists agree on that and this is one of the biggest myths of the liberals in the country, and if it is true, then of course, it is worthwhile the pay more electric bills, but it is not prov proved. we are assuming a fact that is not in evidence.
going to devote a total of 20 minutes it to, and aside from distracting from it, and a bunch of lawyers will do it, and it is fine. and the judicial system is an excellent instrument for curbing ex executive power and happy that the republicans are using it and use everything that you can to curb the imperial presidency, whether it is republican or democrat. adam? disag grree. it is a perfectly good policy conversation, but the house republican leader shship has ply of policy venues, including passing legislation, which is its job. you said it is a waste of time. well, ki appreciate the frustration and appreciate what ben said, there are legal venues to purr sitesue it, but they ca it. well, they can, with all due respect. and we are all against the trivial pursuits and why don t we feed the bar with this frivolous lawsuit. well, i technically agree
he is absolutely right with the premise of it all. sandra? this is the adverse effects of too much government regulation and mandation. this is whap has. look, i happen to agree with him, because we are going to be facing a stark reality and the consumer bills are going to continue to go up, and energy prices continuing to go up, and the government is going to continue on the track based on the climate change results that they see that not everybody agrees on burgs we have to agree on paying higher energy prices. well, adam, hope you are proud of yourself. i was just thinking that in fact, not everybody agrees that the world is round, but the world is in fact round. i happen to prove it to me. well, this is well, it is not quite round though. well, that is great. there is a name for it, but it is not quite round. charlie can prove it to you, neil, but i don t have time right now, and it is an interesting conversation,
consensus was that it was going to be ice. and we would have to wear parkas all year around, and that is then. and adam, who we all love like a brother and a son in my case. not all of the time. and like a son, but we just don t know the answer, and the fact that a whole bunch of scientists put their name on it does not mean they know the answer. we had crazy ideas about many things in the past that the scientists said were valid, and the question is, is the data irrefutable, and if it is, then go forward. and followup on that, i had george schultz, the multirepublican cabinet secretary who was here part of this group that included hank paulson with who gas knows very, very well sh, and who said thatu should be aware of it and formed a group to be aware of it, and has an insurance policy just in case something goes bad. when i asked the secretary to put numbers to the policy, he demurred, but the point is that
when he said that sky electric rates would skyrocket, he meant it. he is carrying it out. how would you want to get c control america the most, do it through the american power plants, and ration the cost, and i m afraid to death for the people of america, and the people in this country should be. there is that white house party christmas invite. and feel ing ting the heat yet? charles stein and adam luchinsky and charles payne and what do you believe that the ceo is going to make here? well, think of the premise to sacrifice all of this stuff, and tax americans and energy bills are necessarily higher, because we need to have the planet might get one degree warmer in the next 100 year, and in the meantime, 18 trillion in debt, no problem. that is not an imminent threat. and think about it for a moment,