Senate, the trial against president bill clinton. Joining us here is alexis simmon burgers. We had never seen anything like this before. The last trial was in the 1860s. No television with Andrew Johnson. What do you remember about what happened and how this transpired . The senate trial was fascinating. A trial that it called but its not a legal proceeding. It is very political. It had so many interesting dynamic characters involved in it. Robert byrd, senator byrd of was virginia, stalwart constitutional scholar. Not a supporter or friend of bill clinton in any particular way. He ended up at one point just throwing up his hands and saying , this should not have even happened. The trial was misguided. That hehis colleagues was going to introduce a motion to dismiss the whole thing. Senators played different roles. The house managers were fascinated to listen to the president legal team. Array of legal representation there. Adalso tried to sort of english on the ball. He wanted to repr
No television, of course, with Andrew Johnson. What do you remember about what happened and how this all of this transpired over the next month . The senate trial was fascinating because of the idea that it is called a trial, but its not a legal proceeding. It is very political. It had so many interesting dynamic characters involved in it. Robert byrd, senator byrd of was of west virginia, stalwart constitutional scholar. Not a supporter or friend of bill clinton in any particular way. He ended up at one point just throwing up his hands and saying, this should not have even happened. That the trial was misguided. He told his colleagues that he was going to introduce a motion to dismiss the whole thing. So, different senators played different roles. The house managers were fascinated to listen to the president s legal team. He had a strong array of legal representation there. He also tried to sort of add english on the ball. He wanted to represent, he had women as his legal representati
We had never seen anything like trial was e the last in the 1860s. What do you remember about what how all of this transpired the next month . The senate trial was fascinating because of the idea but it is ed a trial not a legal proceeding and it is very political. It had so many interesting dynamic characters involved. Bird of West Virginia scholar constitutional and not a supporter or friend of bill clinton in any particular way, he ended up at one point throwing up his hands and saying this should not have even happened, the trial is misguided and he even told his colleagues he was going to introduce a otion to dismiss the whole thing. Different senators played different roles. Managers were ascinating the president s legal team was interesting. He had a strong array of legal and tried to sort some, put some english on the ball because he wanted to he had women as his legal representation. Own personal russ was the k and he use counsel relied on them to give this assionate idea abou
Approve it because they feared saudi would strengthen israel Serono Reagan handed the deal is the effect of the 2 his political soulmate sacha un seen nothing yet was a very tough act to follow god. When we stumbled on the saudi arms. Deal we really started to stumble on a central feature of british politics over the last 30 years highness french has been at the heart of many of the great load event of the polish time. I was always face to see him when i was Prime Minister because he brought me extraordinary insight im bold proposal. She informed us she considers saudi arabia as a strong friend and would be willing to support taking them with whatever the kingdom needs and of discussion from there on Everything Else was going to get he explained to mrs thatcher this was a deal with saudi arabia and the full things were done differently. They wanted 43000000000. 00 worth of weapons that was 6000000000. 00 in commission. For a majority of people understand this brian. Well continue to Wo
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people to peacefully assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The two, establishment of religion and free exercise come first which is why religious freedom is often called americas first freedom. And establishment actually comes even before religious freedom. It often people understand what establishment is. Now, in 1833, massachusetts disestablished, and what that means is people no longer had to pay taxes to support my own religious ancestors, the congregationalists. Former religion come everybody sitting like this. There is a liturgy, when you rather go to a camp meeting and sang . So that is the end of establishment in that sense. It is not, as we will see this evening, the end of issues about establishment. Similarly, free exercise of religion is difficult for people to unde