You attribute theres a subjective it is fact and the other is story telling keep it to the facts now we would like to hear our story; right . Perfect. Yeah. I do think we oust to when we list the criteria to give them an idea of the points they must hit and i like the fact it maybe not the point i dont know about the points and how to grade them but it will help us if we were to raise the questions that are of importance to us for them to address. So air force. The Eligibility Criteria pretty well independence what comes below it im wondering whether or not we need to expand what weve already done. Certainly, if you provide a lot of jobs you may not provide a lot of jobs but make a huge philanthropic donation to the city so there are ways to contribute to the community and i know that we should prompt but prompt the business heres some ways that you might be contribute to the community. All right. Kind of dont forget about those. Some of the us dignities around the physical features or
Recommendations with the down turn of the economy a lot of employees were being laid off and there was not much hiring being done and the work of the task force as you indicated had kind of dropped off. Thats not to say that none of the recommendations werent implemented. In fact many of them were implemented. Some of them include more accessibility and disabled user friendly resources like the dhr lobby, the dhr website job apps and system of people and employees can apply for jobs. We also provided reasonable accommodations training both for our exam analyst as well as to supervisors and Human Resources of professionals throughout the city about the accommodation process. We also did some outreach to the Human Resources community about rule 115 and how its implemented. But of course there is still much more to do. I see this past year being a rebuilding year with a refocus on revitalizing the hiring of people with disabilities. So as you indicated in december of last year, we started
Good evening. This is the meeting of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services committee of board of supervisors. My name is eric mar, our colleague david campos will not be here today. City clerk i think we need a motion to excuse our colleague. Its been moved that we excused david campos from this meeting. Can we do that without objection . Thank you. We have five items on our agenda, two liquor licenses at the very end. Item no. 3 is supervisor jane kim is on the health code. My understand is she wants to continue that item to the call of the chair. Well continue item 3. If anybody is here to speak on that, well hear on that during public testimony. Please call no. 1. City clerk item no. 1. Hearing implementation of Civil Service rule 115. Supervisor eric mar supervisor christensen reminded me that item no. 2 will be continued too. I also neglected to mention that sf govtv is televising us today. I want to thank them for televising us as well. Item no. 1 is a continuation of heari
We list the criteria to give them an idea of the points they must hit and i like the fact it maybe not the point i dont know about the points and how to grade them but it will help us if we were to raise the questions that are of importance to us for them to address. So air force. The Eligibility Criteria pretty well independence what comes below it im wondering whether or not we need to expand what weve already done. Certainly, if you provide a lot of jobs you may not provide a lot of jobs but make a huge philanthropic donation to the city so there are ways to contribute to the community and i know that we should prompt but prompt the business heres some ways that you might be contribute to the community. All right. Kind of dont forget about those. Some of the us dignities around the physical features or requiring some kind of documentation is specifically for businesses that are a long time businesses and if theyve not stayed in the family burr been bout by other owners sort of the d
For the mayors with disabilities and 2 years ago we signed the americans with disabilities act and we had more than 500 people come and the theme was it doesnt stop here the reason is under the dream of the ada employment is really the portion that is unfulfilled. We really have not reached the numbers that i think the founders really expected when the ada was first signed and much of the public testimony back in 1988 and 1989 about the needs for this civil rights legislation focused on employment as an issue. People with disabilities is only 1 3 as likely to be employed from people without disabilities and their income is dramatically lower than a peer who doesnt have a disability. On average we only earn between 20 and 26,000 a year and nobody can live on that in San Francisco. We cant truly lead independent lives until we have economic independence and meaningful jobs. I want to thank you, supervisor mar for scheduling this hearing today and also for starting this conversation about