In america a College Degree requires a great deal. A decades worth of debt. Studying so hard it requires trust to. Go through humiliation to enter society. And party dead sometimes quite literally. Want other true colors of universities in the us. Mr reback ill be honest with you russia is baffled and this is how people see the story first the i. O. C. Bans a group of russian athletes from competing ever again then your court says no the sanctions must be lifted but then n. P. R. And chang cass rejects the appeals so i thought that the sanctions were about competing in the first place how is that possible maybe to summarize this without being too legalistic we call the first case the such a case in the second case the case of such a case was a disciplinary case initiated by the International Olympic committee versus many athletes many russian athletes and we had that case that we heard in geneva two weeks before the start of the games involving thirty nine russian athletes. This was a
Suspended anymore after our decisions on the first of february. So thats the first part it was disciplinary the second case which i called the junction case which was involving the decision of the i. O. C. Not to invite some russian athletes so these twenty eight at leats who were no longer suspended applied to be eligible to compete in some of them yes some of them sorry fifteen i think so its in that league plus two coaches these athletes applied but were denied access to the games because the i. O. C. Decided not to invite them so it was not a sanction it was an eligibility issue thats a legal difference for us understand the reaction of the public in russia because it doesnt seem logical exactly the russian side doesnt see the logic here so please let me just go back to something you read out on the opening day the process created by the i. O. C. To establish an invitation list of russian athletes to compete as a lump of athletes from russia could not be described as a sanction but
Sorry but i thought that was the job of cas to determine whether that suspicion is enough or that kind of bad or if theres evidence to determine if the evidence is enough wasnt this what was being decided in this room. For being too legalistic but this is exactly the notion of comfortable such as faction which is the criteria to sublease whether theres enough evidence or not enough evidence constable satisfaction means that you can have a certain number of evidence which may be sufficient or not sufficient if the panel deems convinced that it has sufficient evidence to establish the guilt of someone then it is that but if its not sufficient it may be that there are suspicions which are not. Confirmed by sufficient evidence i dont know if im clear because its a little bit complicated but if you have a. Scale you. Have some elements which show some. Suspicious actions by the athletes but they may not be sufficient to convince the panel that for sure this athlete is guilty of an antidopin
Is the case such a case was a disciplinary case initiated by the International Olympic committee versus many athletes many russian athletes and we had that case that we heard in geneva two weeks before the start of the games involving thirty nine russian athletes. This was a totally unusual case i think in the history of class because it was not a classic doping case where you have a positive test by an athlete in the athlete has to establish his innocence here it was the national Olympic Committee which had to prove to establish the guilt of these athletes so it had to show evidence and we decided i mean the cast determined that on eleven cases there was sufficient evidence to confirm that there was an antidoping rule but for twenty eight cases there was not enough evidence therefore these twenty eight athletes were no longer sanctioned so the were not suspended anymore after decisions on the first of february so thats the first part it was disciplinary the second case which i called
World Anti Doping Agency confirmed appealing decision of disciplinary tribunal of Russian Anti Doping Agency in Kamila Valieva case to Court of Arbitration for Sport. RUSADA tribunal found teenage figure skater bore NFON testing positive for banned heart drug Trimetazidine